Andrew McCarthy: Is the Constitution really protects against Columbia Agitator Mahmud Khalil’s deportation?

I was actually a mafia and a terrorist prosecutor before starting to play one on television. Continuing a worthy target to save foreign terrorist supporters from our countries, the first amendment should be considered specifically about the rights of free speaking and free unity.

So with the risk of getting to know myself before talking Mahmoud KhalilI want to talk to you about Tom Hagen.

The film buffers will immediately remember Hagen (will be described by Robert Duvall), such as Kinleone family’s associations in the commercial film (adapted from Mario Puzon’s novels). Perhaps the most memorable vignette, Hagen said you are a “mediator” who intercedes on behalf of Don Corleone with the famous Hollywood manufacturer Jack Woltz.

Trump anti-Israeli activist Mahmoud Khalil ‘was the first prison for the arrival of many

Remember: Hagen Woltz, if you do not give the godson a long-anticipated film, is suitable for bad things to happen. Make sure Hagen’s “mediator” “broker”, the manufacturer wakes up to find his award-winning competition under his blood shed satin layers in a short time. Thus, the Woltz gives me the mother side.

Euphemistically, we can say that Hagen Woltz “Reason” was there for “to make a suggestion that could not give it up.” In the law, we have a different word for this: usurpation. This is a crime as rating. In a courtroom, Tom Hagen said he simply spoke to Woltz and enjoyed the right to express release on behalf of Corleones, which coated freely.

We know this intuitively, and this is a bed principle of the criminal law. This First correction The government prevents speech preventing – the words are not a crime. This prevents the government from criminalizing the collection of two or more people together – simply unity is not a crime.

Nevertheless, if a person is credible in crimes as a human invasionThere is no legal prohibition against the use of the speech as proof of these crimes. If a person was accused of a reliable assassination, the conspirators do not have a legal bar with each other and each other with each other with each other with each other in a criminal agreement.

Take it into account. We have already heard about the first adjustment for the Syrian original Columbia University student Khalil. The Palestinian Heritage and Trump leadership claims that in the United States for about 30 years, the role of the campus risions supported by Hamas, which is a terrorist organization in the US legislation.

In short, the defense goes like this. Khalil Legally permanent permanent constant resident alien (LPR), which is the owner of a green card. As a matter of law, this rights makes the American citizen to do about the United States. Ergo, he cannot be legally expelled for the constitutional behavior – could not act as a “mediator”, which interacted with the COLUMBIA administration on behalf of the Pro-Haha-Pro. Now there are a number of legal flaws in this defense (I mentioned them with this national view essay). Although the rights of LPRs are similar to American citizens, they are not the same. LPRS is still aliens. The Federal Immigration Law has long been deported to foreigners, terrorist support, terrorist support and national security issues – something that cannot be made for US citizens.

But I want to get a problem with the main room Khalil Behavior was nothing but a constitutional speech and unity, which will face the legal consequences of America.

I guess we understand organized crime. In all years, I claimed that they had no defender’s lawyer in the Prosecutor’s Office, when the patron says the “ejaculation” button, just used the right to speak.

Again, when I started terrorism after the terrorist center, the jihadists saw that this dispute was significant – only to do this about the damage of religious freedom and political prisoners.

Don’t be fooled.

Khalil is not deported because he is a Muslim or is against the existence of Israel as a Jewish state. It is not a point of political speech and like-minded students (Muslims or non-Muslims) – even supporters and supporters will believe that they are the only point.

Click here for more Fox News Review

On behalf of the campus agitators, “mediating” – was mediated by the work of an illegal coupon to their work and illegally occupied and illegally occupied and vandalized university buildings, in the case of the concept of worse damage on the campus.

This is not a political speech. This is a usurpation. American citizens engaged in such behavior would not be the first amendment. Most likely, they would encounter the follow-up, and in fact, with them were arrested in connection with these activities and will still face other legal consequences.

Click here to get FOX News app

Khalil does not provide a deep constitutional argument. His work refers to the security of citizens, the government, which is responsible for the safety of foreigners, even LPR – even the government’s reputation that threatens us. This authority has the constitution, as well as the immigration and criminal laws of the United States.

Years ago, when they hoped for the jihadists and their supporters, we will have a common sense of the door of all of us after the rafling of our lawyers on the glory of our Constitution. Let’s not do it.

Click here to read more from Andrew McCarthy