Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Behind the Whistle, the former Premier League Judge Chris Foy, the weekend passes the selection of the main match decisions of EFL movement.
The decision-making of supporters of the ELL clubs behind the beat is to inform you of specifying certain calls to understand how the game laws are interpreted.
As part of a regular feature in the sky sports by the end of a match day, Foy will be here to manage you in some judge issues in EFL …
Event: Possible Red Card, Serious Disruption (Body City)
Decision: Red Card (Key City)
Foil says: “For me, this is a flat red, due to the lack of control in Anborne Square, threatens the security of the ramp security safety.
“Although it seems at first glance, the body number 12 solves the city, and it shows his opponent late, and the repetition shows that it is worse.
“When entering the call, there is no Hull, it is air and aggast with both feet. He does not control his body at this point. The speed and force of the challenge threatens the opponent’s security.
“The judge correctly determines that this call is a serious violation and the red card is brand.”
Event: The goal hit, offside (Oxford United)
Decision: The goal was rewarded (Oxford United
Foil says: “This is a great job, because the judge and the auxiliary referee have brilliantly connected to the exact understanding of what happened.
“Oxford United’s goal card, if it is clear to see that 9’s offside position, if the attacker takes the ball directly from the shoot, offside does not have a crime.
“If the shooting does not go to the attacker directly, the judge and auxiliary judge, first of all, the non-touch of Oxford United, NO A NO 3, which is another defender, NOUNSI, NO AT 3.
“Therefore, Oxford United ofside No. 9 does not commit crime and the goal is awarded properly.”
Event: Possible penalty (peterborough united)
Decision: There is no punishment (peterborouououough United)
Foil says: “It is good to see that the judge here has not established any connection in Peterborough Undente. He walks around the goalkeeper and does not come to the ground.
“Although the goalkeeper did not contact the goalkeeper, the goalkeeper, Peterborough Untente’s actions, so Judge Wycombe had a defensive free kick and the attacker needed to warn”
Event: Possible punishment, bad (bromley)
Decision: There is no punishment (bromley)
Foil says: Although this incident was sympathetic with the defender, the Tranmere Rovers for me were lucky that a spot strike was not rewarded.
“If the Tranmere’s No. 2 penalty is going to go to clean the ball, Bromley is hit by the attack.
“I think the connection is enough to guarantee the player’s decline and it would be for a penalty to be decided here in my eyes.”