A bridge is too far away? Criticism of the Prague Railway Project

The Czech capital’s capital is one of the European architectural stones in Europe: mainly involves 8 million tourists a year, mostly occupied and war.

This is a live tablet of architectural styles; From the Middle Ages to the baroque from the industry. Thus, when a sign of Prague is slag for demolition or reconstruction, regular passions are constantly awakening.

“I think this bridge is completely key to Prague,” said Architect and Bridge Engineer, Pet Tej, 123-year-old VYsehrad railway bridge continued his hand on the rusty covers.

“Panorama, along with the Vyshrad fortress behind this, the panorama is at the same level as the Panorama of the Charles Bridge. These two panoramas – it is important to Prague and we must protect them.”

We looked at the arches of the arches, which is a sign of Prague’s southern sky line, which is running in the walking walk along with the rusty steel bridge.

As we talked about a train, went to the West on the river, and from the Smichov station of Prague and from there, we went to Karlovy, Pilsen or Germany.

“These bits are most affected here,” Petr told me: “Petr told me that rivinous joints and rays.

Petr is part of an international coalition of international experts that restore similar steel bridges all over the world – some in the form of worse.

The plan of this Iconic Industrigmark, built in 1902 during the admiration of the Railway Organization, the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, says this Iconic Industrigmark’s demolition plan – completely unnecessary.

“Previous expert reports said that 70% of the steel should be changed. Our research is only 15%. This is a big difference.”

The foundation of the foundation is simple: Repair the bridge on the spot, save the trains and minimize the breach of the train and save money.

Earlier this year, their results were approved by UNESCO, which protects most of the historical center of Prague. Vysehrist supports more than 25,000 residents who signed an application that requires a change of bridge.

After a while, in the shadow of the metal rescues, Director of the Construction Preparatory Department of the Railway Institution Pavel Caborar, shaken his head in disagreements.

“This bridge is now working around three-quarters of Prague’s railway traffic. It can work harder, but only 60% of its power can carry 60% of its power.

“With the predicted growth in the railway, it will be a major transport problem. Yes, it is a protected historical monument, but it is becoming more and less of these two things – the protection of transport needs and heritage is simply impossible.”

A third road on the new bridge will be a fair tribute for visuality, the original. The entire area will be animated and transport connection will be improved from the main station from the main station of Prague to the west and edge of the country.

Meanwhile, the old bridge will be disassembled to the modrany region to start a new life as a link to pedestrians and cyclists and will be demolished and relocated to about 8 km (5 miles).

However, this idea was also criticized by the propagals. In Modrany, the Vltava River is almost half as in the city center. One city railway bridge, they say it will be completely out of place in the middle of a meadow.

“There are two contradictory interests in playing here – there are two contradictory interests to transport and protect our cultural heritage,” said Thomas Bistricky, the philanthropist and Vysehrad Bridge Foundation, a second, thin bridge with a second, thin bridge.

“But our study is generally indicating that there is no conflict; contrast, these two things support each other.”

Age old dilemma: Destroy the name of modernity or maintain the tradition name. Especially in a city that is proud to protect architecture evokes strong emotions.

As a result, and perhaps, the Czech government will have to be decided by the Czech government, not by more quickly, railway engineers or heritage promoters.