International ‘Reactivity’ Force planned for the Ukrainian ceasefire

The discussion in London should be described as “peacekeeping force, not” peacekeeping force, not “peacekeeping force”, but to “peace.”

He is currently scheduled for the multinational force of Ukraine or MFU, and to cement any ceasefire and send to the country to promote long-term confidence in the country.

Focus will be provided with air cover to maintain a marine presence in the Black Sea to protect the safety of heaven and encourage trade in the Black Sea.

“The placement of boots” called “boots” – likely to be approximately 20,000 – it will not be large enough to apply any peace.

Instead, troops are provided with the so-called “eager coalition” – it will likely be placed to protect cities, ports and main energy infrastructure.

An option considered, the failure to operate in the east of Ukraine near the front line of MFI, did not pose any insulting threat to convince Russia.

Russia President Vladimir Putin and Kremlin said they repeatedly disagree ceasefire repeatedly if Europe and other forces are placed in Ukraine.

Sources should not be “peacekeeping force” in Ukraine that any multinational operation will not be “peacekeeping force.”

The peacekeeping forces – under the auspices of the United Nations or NATO – are traditionally impartially, work with the consent of both parties and applies force to defend themselves. The multinational force discussed would be much on the side of Ukraine, there would be much to help prevent future Russian aggression.

Currently, the multinational power in the ground is not expected to monitor any ceasefire. This will be done with Western control assets in the Ukrainian troops and air and space in the frontline.

Sources also said that coalition troops will not be placed in order to ensure the so-called Tripwire Force – the opponent is a small force, Russia stopped occupying Ukraine, and the opponent is a small force.

It is said that the military impact of any allied placement will be limited to the number of troops on both sides of the front line.

Ukraine has almost one million military personnel, the Russian army is even greater.

On Thursday, the best of any international power in the focus of the discussions can provide assets of any international force that are assets of Ukraine, especially in the air.

Thus, there will be discussions on which countries can provide fighter jets to keep Ukraine’s sky safe during the ceasefire.

There will also be discussions on how to secure the Black Sea. These two components can attract: how the shipping strips can be cleaned of mines and what type of sea can provide a workforce in the sea.

The main uncertainty is whether the United States will provide any air, satellite or exploration cover for any European force.

That the United States would not want to be so far to provide any military “backpack”.

The European strategy is now to stop asking the United States and organize the best strength and abilities to ensure Ukrainian security instead. Once the details are agreed, the Britain, France and others see whether the European proposal is important for the change of heart and agrees to play a role.

All this planning is certainly a ceasefire in Ukraine.

Although the United States remains optimistic, many in Ukraine are doubtful that Russia will want to end the struggle.