The French parliament is self-controversy to change the law of aggression to include consent

Many countries require not to agree before sex – and we wrote to the law of aggression. France is not among them.

Now the two deputies hoped to change it, and took a step closer to Tuesday night, passed a bill, which expands the definition of the French parliament, to enter an inadequate penetration.

After a terrible trial, their reason was stuck after them fell in the Gisèle was in rape of the pelicot While it is in a deep medication.

“This is a recent starting point, not the last one,” Marie-Charlotte Garin, one of the two deputies offering the bill, the Milli Majlis reported after voting. “We passed the culture of aggression in the culture of consent and this is the first stone we have taken in the wall of this impunity.”

The bill will be discussed in the upper house.

The change is why it is proposed and a number of information about whose objects.

How does the French aggression define and why do you change the definition?

The French law determines the aggression as a sexual influence, a woman or a person who is a woman or human being – a woman or a person committed by a woman or human being – a person or surprise.

Garin, one of the two deputies, one of the two deputies offering changes, said that about 70 percent of the victims of the victims of the aggression and could not resist.

However, the lack of resistance is often accepted as permission by courts. Catherine Le Magueresse, A legal scientist and supporter of the change, “When there is no resistance, Monsieur has court decisions that there is no resistance.”

In most cases of aggression, the main defense of the attackers, the bidder wanted to have sex, said that Ms. Le Magueresse said.

“We would add a security step for women, and then,” I thought he agreed that he was “I thought he agreed,” said Magueresse, the book of “consent traps”.

Other supporters of the change say that they will expand the lens of police research to consider the suspect wanted to obtain the consent of the suspect, but to provide his resistance.

And, perhaps the most important thing is to reduce the level of impunity when it comes to a crime in France.

Includes the laws of aggression to other countries?

Yes. Here’s an example.

The definition of rape in Canada has led to a positive agreement since 1983.

In Europe, a real boost to include consent in the penalty code, occurred after the arrival of METOO in 2017. Since then, the number of European countries, including consent to their law, has increased from seven to 20 2024 sheet Journal of International Law, Criminal and Justice.

The definition of aggression in the United States varies from the state to the state. Deborah Tuerkheimer, a legal professor at Northwest University Deborah Tuerkheimer, a small number of state requires a positive agreement.

Why are some activists against the law consent?

Among those who oppose change are some feminist activists and lawyers. It is said that definitely not to worsen the attention of those who are accused of investigators, but to protect the attention of victims and worse for victims.

“This is a common trap,” he said, a lawyer Lorraine Questiaux, who defended the victims of violence. “He has nothing to do with the consent of the aggression. It is related to this dominance.”

French feminist philosopher Manon Garcia, who published a book about the Pelicot Court, said that the law will not solve the deeper social problems of the incident.

The needed thing is “a small change in the legal definition of aggression”, “he said Interview with French Culture Radio Station. “It has funds to teach women for police, for justice systems, small boys and men to teach small boys and men and teach other people’s shoes, and to teach women that women can love.”

How did the Pelicot court affect the dispute?

Pelicot claim amazed France. Ms. Pelicot’s former husband was convicted of harassing him to harass him after making others unique. The court also tried 50 other accusedMost of the aggression.

French lawyer has automatically raped someone who has already penetrated someone who has already penetrated drugs or sleep.

Again, Judge Arata, Roger Arata, after a suspect, he believed that Ms. Pelicot agreed to have sex. Many never talked to him and that his husband agreed to him, and said that they had shocked in France.

“We would not be here without a pelicot test,” said Mrs. Gorine, MP. “It became politically unacceptable to prevent how great the culture of aggression in France, so it does not change anything lawful.”