Pipelines appear to be a more popular Trump threats. But does it make sense to build new ones?

In May 1, 2024 in May 2024, the Trans Mountain Pipeline from Alberta to BC coast, no opening ceremony was opened. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has purchased the project and spends more than $ 34 billion, has made a pipeline that has so far been one of the infrastructure projects so far – almost nothing.

“This was something that the liberal government had the right to the oil sector … and not noted it. There was no ribbon cutting ceremony,” said Rory Johnston, founder Commodity contextOil market research service.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, even a large trudeau antagonist, thanked the federal liberals to end the pipeline, saying Alberta would be a “game change” for the oil industry and it leads to the federal provincial cooperation.

However, liberals have been criticized by the government, which betrays the government’s goals and betrayal of waste and betraying the oil and gas industry – a mass-gas industry – a mass impetus of Canada.

All this week this week seemed to be a remote memory in the debates of the leadership of the party. Leadership Frontrunner candidates in both French and English disputes expressed their warm feelings for the pipelines.

“A project like energy is possible. It is possible to build a pipeline to Quebec, Alberta’s seats.

“Today, I am very proud to be a minister for our energy for our energy. This is so valuable today. We give us an alternative to the United States.

All this faces Canadian US President Donald Trump’s 51st state of Canada and hitting the tariffs for Canadian tariffs – Canada can lower the export-dependent economy – a new interest in Canada’s economic and energy and pipeline.

However, although the political climate is more favorable for new pipeline projects, they are still facing a passage of fossil fuel.

This can be a meaningful meaning of politicians seeking the goal when Canada’s energy security and politicians are facing Trump, but it may not be very attractive for private companies trying to earn a profit.

What do Canadians think of new pipelines?

An online Angus Reid survey In late January, it offers a compliance with the support of the Canadian pipeline consisting of 2.012 Canadians.

Energy East, the West-East Pipeline Offer, which has been abolished in 2017, has seen that its support has increased by 58 to 65 percent since 2019. Support for the pipeline, reached 47 percent in Quebec, where there is a massive movement against the project in the environment.

More than half of the Canadians appear to be supported by a proposed pipeline that will bring Alberta oil to BC coast Was canceled by Trudeau Government in 2016.

55% of the survey in the Survey in BC, initially potentially spilled in the province of local and environmental groups and in the waters of the Northern BC

“People are pouring some kind for alternatives. You know how do we develop our economy from the United States?” said Hayden Mertins-Kirkwood, a senior researcher in the Canadian Politics Center.

He said that turning to the pipelines should use the lack of political concepts and the use of other industries in Canada – as a clean electricity or production in a world far from fossil fossils.

“The assets that are closed here are in this great risk, which continues to reduce this, the infrastructure will be in the next few decades,” he said.

“Instead of building a new infrastructure, we have been going on to us for 100 years.”

Matto Mildenberg in Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, who studied the policy and policies in North America, has opened a place to talk about US pipelines, the first liberal government for about ten years is the main priority.

“I do not see the messaging we hear from Freand and Carney campaigns, as a matter of prioritizing the climate as a matter,” he said.

What classes were learned from the trans mountain?

The cost of the trans mountain project and its eye water exceeds machines on any future Canadian pipeline offers.

Texas Basic Kinder offered to expand the pipeline in 2012. The pipeline carries oil from Alberta to the oil and west coast, and Alberta created opportunities for oil companies to export it to the markets in Asia and elsewhere.

However, the project faced important protests and legal problems with the environmental groups, the Government of the First Nations and the BC. In 2018, Morgan has stopped the project, and it said he could completely leave for all the opposition.

Trudeau government then stepped up to finish it, buys the pipeline for $ 4.5 billion and spends billions more to build expansion.

“Although it is severe on the budget, the pipeline itself is never violated as a standalone project, the use of the crown is a broader economic picture of the fact that the federal government is valuable,” Johnston said.

He said that the government may take into account the long-term benefits for the oil industry, and now it will be a way to export oil without entirely trusting the United States, even if the pipeline itself succeeds as a business.

As part of the process of scheduling payments for companies using the pipeline, the Federal Energy Regulator is preparing to consider why the project is so expensive.

“I think that if we are seriously approaching the project of such a nation, we must understand what the trans mountain is,” Johnston, some of the costs of some expenses, or bad luck, as bad luck. He said other pipelines could not have such expensive obstacles.

What about the pure energy pass?

Since then 2021The international energy agency recommended by industrialized countries on energy markets and forecasts: the world must be focused on net zero emissions until 2050 to prevent the worst effects of more frequent and heavy climate change.

That means IEA, it means There are no new long-term oil and gas projects should be built.

Last June, this predict The global oil demand will rise to 2029, as the power generation is more popular in renewable sources and electric vehicles.

“If the world is successful in achieving enough fossil requirements to reach the net zero emissions until 2050, the new projects will face great commercial risks, because the agency warns, because the world will not be renewable energy and there would be no need for a renewable energy.

“I think that the Canadians intend to fight the role of the march of the march and hiking of the fossil economy in the global economy in the global economy, and the Canadian economy will not be able to root in the economy for a long time,” he said.

“I think a better approach to thinking about the disorder created by the current American administration is to think in other ways that Canada meet the needs of the climate.”