Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Unlock the editor’s digestion free
FT editor Roula Khalaf, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The UK’s Highest Court, the concept of “woman” in equality belongs to a person who has been born to a person who hit the rights of the Transgender people, belongs to someone who is born.
This Supreme Court The meaning of the law whether the “woman” in a vague decision has not been extended to a trans a transmitted transmittance.
The decision, which was closely followed on Wednesday, was met with campaigns to spread sexual well, but the protection of the Transgender people asked for concerns.
“The ‘female’ and ‘female’ and ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ and biological sex in the Biliticist Law are referring to the Biological Woman and Biological Sex,” the LORD Patrick Hodge said the Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Court.
But he added: “We recommend this decision to read like the victory of one or more groups in our society or the winner of several groups.”
He noted that the act of equality is another protector against the people of Transgender, including discrimination and aggression.
The UK government, the ruling “hospital, refugees and sports clubs, brings clarity and confidence in women and service providers,” he said. He added that “sex venues are protected in the law and will always be protected by the government.”
The decision of the Supreme Court, which is jurisdiction in the United Kingdom, is caused by a legal war in Scotland.
Scottish campaign group (FWS) protested against a bill to increase a female representation on the boards of the legitimate bodies of the Scottish government in 2018.
FWS was first able to challenge the law, which includes Trans Women in Women. The meeting of the meeting in Edinburgh said the issue was outside the legal body of the Scottish Parliament in 2022.
However, in response to this sentence, the Scottish government changed the approach to the revised legal leader, saying that a woman with a woman with a woman with a woman in Equality 1.
FWS This management was re-defined by the Scottish government, which was re-defined by the Scottish government under the acts of equality.
Scottish courts rejected the problem of FWS, but this went to the Supreme Court of England on Wednesday.
The issue was severely political discussions in recent years and the last summer was the linear line of distribution between the general elections.
Sir Keir Starmer, although a woman will be the penis, although these women were not like this for 99.9 percent. Tori, in the meantime, it is promised to change the protected feature of the breeds as “biological sex” to change the act of equality.
On Wednesday, Minister of Former Women and Equality Tory Leader Kemi Badenoch said in response to the judge, “Trans Women’s Women were never true …….” You cannot change your biological gender. “
After the decision of the British government, his party demanded the “clarify all existing management.”
Chelsea Feeney, Stevens and a colleague in Bolton law firm, said he would be remembered in many disputes.
Employers may have to consider the human resources policy to ensure that women are eligible for the updated definition.
Policies related to single-sex gaps can rule out transgender people with gender recognition certificates from non-biological sexual areas.
Doinlav business partner Elizabeth McGlone described the effect as “giant”.
“Employers” should take into account the policy of women in relating to women ‘”biological women,” for the purpose of the act of equality. “
Scottish greens judgment described the “deep concern for human rights” and “a great blow to most marginalized people in our society.”
“It can eliminate important protectors and many trans people and relatives will disturb the deeply,” said Maggie Chapman MSP.
Scotland’s first minister John Swinney, in an article in the X, he said that the impact of the government. “Protecting the rights of everything, he will support our actions,” he said.
