Max Verstappen refuses to explain the disappointment in the fine for the incident for the incident with Oscar Piasti in GP in GP.

Max Verstappen claimed that “managing the full truth”, the reason for the fact that Saudi Arabia could not explain dissatisfaction during the Grand Prix.

The dominion that began the pole in Jeddah, the world champion, the winning Oscar Piasti and the incident was punished for winning the advantage in the first corner.

McLaren, a second better in the network, and refused to give Dutchman, instead of using the lead facility to use the lead.

Red Bull and Verstappen immediately chose to not immediately give the position of Piasti, before, managers decided to make a five-second penalty, which allowed the lead to the only round of Australia’s only round.

Verstappen, the decision was unhappy, but the exercise body of the exercise was unable to work because he was afraid of the FIA because he had difficulty himself, he said.

“The problem is that I can’t share my opinion about it because I can fine,” said Verstappen. “So it’s better not to talk about it.

“I think it’s better not to talk about it. I say or try to tell you about it, you can bother me.”

He asked if he was nervous to bite his tongue, added: “I think the world we live alone cannot share your opinion because it probably cannot control the full truth.

“If you don’t have to say so much to me, this is what I have to do in good time.

“It’s honest with how everything will happen. Everything is super against everything.

Different rules this year?

In an interview after the race SKY SPORTS F1Verstappen was asked how the event was punished by the MCLaren driver, which was punished in the same crime, the United States in the United States in the Grand Prix of Lando Norris.

Verstappen appeared to claim that the rules of drivers in the rules of drivers this season were a change, and the events could not be compared.

He said, “We talked about it very much and last year this year is different this year, so it is not a problem.

“But honestly, this is not my problem, but to be honest.”

The output wanted, then added: “Let’s get the documentwork. All is written.”

In his official written decisions in connection with the incident, the managers said he was in front of a car from the past car – said he had the corner of the instructions.

Judge, “Management / Marshalling system reviews, video, time, telemetry and video evidence in the car, and 1 of the car between the corner and the corner of the corner and the corner of the car by the corner of the car

“According to the rules of the driver’s standards, therefore was the corner of 81 and had the right to have a room given to it.

“Car 1 then left the road and gained a continuous preference. 81 was in front of the car and tried to build an advantage.”

Horner: Perhaps the rules need to look back

The main Christian Horner of the Red Bull was ready to take the decision unfairly, why the decision was unfair, that the decision was unfair.

He said, “I thought it was very tough. Because we did not believe that we did something wrong.

“I can’t see how the managers got this result. They both went to the same speed. It’s not the corner in the depth of Oscar, the maximum can not simply disappear.

“Perhaps the need to reconsider these rules. I do not know what happened to the ‘competition’ in his first lap. It simply seems to be abandoned.”

Horner added that confidence in the end of the managers would complain about the sentence of the Red Bull that he was “highly difficult.”

He also explained that the decision to adopt a penalty more than the penalty, the Mercedes of Red Bull was affected by the threat of George Russell’s third.

“If we gave it, we would run in the dirty air, and then we would risk George,” Horner said. “So, the best, we received the punishment at this point, we lowered your head and continue.”

Piastri: How to solve this

Pretending the third victory of the season, Peastri, the first time in his career, was the leader of the world championship, was correctly corrected in the judge in his favor.

“I got a big start and got myself next to him,” Australia. “From this point, I have to brake, but I knew that there was enough of my car to draw in the corner.

“We both brake extremely late, but I think I can brake as soon as I can in the way for me. I think this is how it will happen.”

McLaren Racing Racing said the chief executive pole brown, “definitely” “absolute” deserves punishment after connecting the corner and position.

Brown Sky Sports said to F1: “I thought it was definitely worthy. Oscar, it was clear inside, and you know, you need to use the race path.

“Let the fifth second return a penalty or position, you can go in both ways. I thought it was definitely. It was Oscar’s corner and suddenly had to agree.”

Brundle: Piasti was in the corner

F1 of F1, a live broadcast in the incident, Martin Brundle, Vertappen’s sentence, and admired the people standing after the competition.

Brundle said: “Oscar fell from the first corner, entered the first apex and read the rules for 2025 – and he was in the corner.

“But if your opponent wants to get out of the brakes – and if you look, there are no more steering lock – Maxim did not try to walk outside.

“He lost the corner and he had to withdraw.

“I think the team should return the place straight. I think it will be punished for this, and then the race may have a chance to win.”

Formula 1, heads on May 2-4, the heads of Miami for a sprint weekend, Sky Sports F1. Now the day of the day – no contract, no contract canceled

Source link