Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content in the industry’s leading AI coverage. Learn more
Ask: Which product should the machine study (ml) use?
Project Manager Answer: Yes.
Jokes have increased our understanding that the arrival of generative AI, the best of use of the cases of use of the best. Historically, we have always accepted ML for ML repetitive, predictive examples In customer practices, but now, it is possible to use the ML form without all training information.
Nevertheless, “Which customer needs requires a Solution AI?” The answer to the question is still not always “yes”. Great language models (LLMS) can still be prohibited and as in all ML models, LLS is not always accurate. Always be used when a ML app does not move the right path. How do we assess the needs of our customers to implement the AI as AI project managers?
The main considerations to help this decision are as follows:
Summarizing the need for the customer needs of project managers and seeing a quick description, but I summarize the views, but determine that the customer needs to evaluate and implement the ML of ML.
Type of customer needs | Example | ML application (yes / no / dependent) | ML application type |
---|---|---|---|
Recurring tasks that a client needs the same exit for the same entry | Add my email online in various forms | No | Creating a system based on the rules is enough to help you in your speeches |
Recurring tasks that a client needs different performances for the same entry | The client is in the “discovery mode” and is in the same action (such as the account of the account) waiting for a new experience: – Create a new piece of art per click –Dumbleupon (Do you remember?) Find a new corner of the Internet through casual search | Yes | – Generation LLMS -Morib algorithms (cooperation filter) |
Repetitive tasks that the customer needs the same / similar exit for different entries | – Favorites Topics from customer feedback | Dependent | If the number of entries and output combinations is simple enough, the system based on the rules can still work for you. However, if you have started a number of entries and results, the rules-based system cannot be effectively scale, consider leaning: -Courseers But if these entries have examples. If there is no example, consider using LLMS, but for one-time scenarios (LLS is not as accurate as controlled models). |
Repeated tasks that the customer needs different performances for different entries | -Avçelerik Customer Support Questions -Ant to look for | Yes | It is rare to be found in the samples you can provide different performances for different entrances on a scale without ML. There are simply a lot of change for an application that is effectively applied in a scale order. Think: -Lms with a return generation (dwarf) |
Repetitive tasks with different performances | Review of a hotel / restaurant | Yes | Pre-LLMS, this type of scenario was difficult to carry out without models taught for special tasks: -Hastropolitan Nerve Networks (RNNS) LLS is an excellent suit for this type of scenario. |
Bottom line: Do not use a lamp where a simple pair of scissors can do. Using the above matrix of your client, taking into account the cost and sensitivity of the above, rate the accuracy of the scale, taking into account the accuracy of the height and accuracy.
Shararya Rao Fintech Group is a product manager. The views shown in this article are the absence of the author and absolute companies or organizations.