Why are some people in the global south do not mourn the collapse of USAID Opinion

The United States President Donald Trump has demolished the organization, which is characterized by Blitzkrieg’s International Development Agency and the “world’s largest donor” and splashing assistants to develop the humanitarian response system. Many have cried the difficult consequences of the unprecedented decision of the US President, but also by other countries such as England, to cut help.

Speaking about a Linkedin post, “Since 2003,” said Luca Crudeli, “The Luca Crudder” and “the meaning of confidence in the moral center of our work” and “the development of the humanist spirit of development.”

However, the description of “development” would be a contradiction against many people in the global south of the global south. This does not say that many people working in “Development” are not really interesting in improving the welfare of the world’s welfare. Neither the help industry provides important assistance in which they trust in millions.

It is to say that the privatization of the soul of “Development” is less humanist than their supporters. In fact, the entire aid enterprise is a tool to protect geopolitical control, global inequality and resource extraction of feeding it.

In recent days, after the collapse of the USAID, it is increasing in the reality of this reality – consciously or unconsciously.

For example, “An interaction, which combines the votes of leading and developmental organizations of leading and developmental organizations of American humanitarian and development organizations, a statement issued by mutual activity. These organizations said Before you rush again“Run life to save your life and develop the United States worldwide.” He added that “USAID attack” “Supports America’s global leadership and creates dangerous vacuumes that will be quickly filled in China and our enemies.”

This is not a lot of humanist sound, isn’t it?

Marina Kobzeva spending as an assistant for about two decades commentary The global reacted to the expression of his colleagues from the north and global south. The former Bemuan described the “poor words, … an honest mistake”, while the second is revenge: “Finally, they show their true colors.”

Western humanitarianism has not just lost its way. From the beginning, the western colonialization approached. For example, 1884-1885, 1884-1885, 1884-1885, was framed as the humanitarian event, which put the stage for the conquest of Europe.

Although the first humanitarian organizations resulted in the wild results of the conflict in Europe, as World War II began to play an active role in the global south, many have been actively developed.

The help industry, an effective colonial “cultural mission”. DO-GOUGER image documents on the nature of the international system are tried to exceed the worst of image documents and actually without difficulty in the system. If there is something, the two are in a symbiotic relationship. The help industry, production legitutes global trade and management systems, which in turn produces the results of the existence of assistance agencies.

As a result, today, despite the spread of help and development agencies, the race global order has difficulty with difficulty and deep inequality continues to characterize relations between peoples. In 1997, the US Congress Budget Management may have played a marginal role in 1997 in 1997, and even in improving the economic development and improving the human welfare, and even in improving the human welfare, and even the use of human welfare.

Thus, the help sector is not surprising that the aid sector is not completely sad to see some of those who claim to help him. A former General Director of the New Humanitarian news agency Hebeba Aly said at the last meeting that some activists from the global south, these assistants were less concerned with their assistants, which would be suspended to take responsibility and assist.

This shows how to change the basic reforms of both global and national systems colonial extract For charity.

With Western help, the discharge will undoubtedly be tragic and painful. Some of the most sensitive people in the world will suffer and many will die. We must not lose these arguments by controversy about the righteousness or evil of this for fair or evil. The fact is that we will do our best, not the same as we want, but to improve the effect.

He said that this is an opportunity to start building a world without a world. “This is the beginning of the end of this assistance,” I have written Aity, “We must pay attention to the structural conversion.” This saw the poorest payment for the lifestyle of the reform of global trade and financial systems.

This does not mean that there will be a Hobbezian world without solidarity. On the contrary, it would be a one that charities are not allowed to be a cover for global injustice.

At the same time, the end of the assistance should also see the end of the “Development” of the “developed world”, which is an example of the establishment of the welfare of other societies and the planet and the planet. We must work for an order that really embodies a humanist spirit.

The views shown in this article are unique and definitely reflect the editorial position of Gazir.