The Maldives parliament dominates two Supreme Courts | Political news

The parliament of the Maldives is persecuted two judges of the country’s Supreme Court, changed political parties of political parties, the President of Muzemu Muizzu, the Constitution and strip legislators.

The parliament of the National Congress of the Management National Congress voted to eliminate the allegations of abuse of Zahir and Maahaz Ali Zahir in Azmiral on Wednesday.

68 – 11 votes took place because the resignation of Muizzu’s resignation and the resignation of the parliament because they called the parliamentary resignation and the opposition supporters were in support of the opposition.

Muizzu allies, the judicial guard, two judges and counterpart Hosnu al-Sueisi, justice Hosnu al-Sue. At that time, the seven-membered supreme court bench conducted hearings on the application that complicates anti-warranty measures.

Sued later, he resigned from the best court, Muizzu and lawyer Ahmet Usham, resigned to accuse all judges of the Supreme Court.

The President and his lawyer deny the charges.

“I do not interfere in the courts,” Muizzu said during a 14-hour news conference on May 3. “I haven’t done it.” The court guard). “

The crisis paralyzed the Supreme Court of the Maldives, and stopped hearing in all the continuing work, including constitutional amendments. In 2008, the Indian Ocean elections, the Indian Ocean Honeymoon, lifted the renewable fears in the honeymoon, but the coup, controversial elections, and it roiled by political aggregations greediness and the opposition’s prison.

‘Attack on the judiciary’

Azmiral and Mahaz rejected impeachments on Wednesday.

“This is an attack on the Maldives judiciary. It is not an ordinary issue to bring the Supreme Court of the Maldives,” Azmiral said. “My hope is that the rule of law in this country is a day … All of the various officials participating in the destruction of the Supreme Court are responsible.”

The lawsuit against two referees Azmiralda’s husband Ismail Latheef, a police station on December 4, the capital of Maldivia, a police station raided a police station.

The incident took place two weeks after Muizzu approved antitunity.

Disputed changes, if they change the parties of the elected legislation on the ticket of the political party, or expelled their parties, they will lose their seats. Provisions Muizzu’s Superurtry in Parliament allows you to protect 79 of the party’s seat in parliament.

The President claimed that they were necessary to “improve political stability”, but the opponents say they will destroy the country’s inspection and residue system.

During the arrest of Latheef, a member of the former parliament made an application in the Supreme Court, which complicates the legality of changes, but the bench was not decided to continue the work.

Latheef was released on a period of more than 12 hours, on charges of refering from a prostitute, but a judge in the Criminal Court. The judge noted that the treatment of latheef treatment was fully dressed in the raid and the room was completely dressed in time.

The prosecutor’s office then treated the lawsuit against Latheef, referring to the lack of evidence.

However, after the Supreme Court began to look at the constitutional changes in February, the Judicial Commissions (OJSC) received a separate claim against Azmiral and Mahaz, the release of the two judges, the release of the latheef, the illegal referees illegally made a lobby.

OJSC recommended the parliament to surrender to them last month.

‘There are no motifs of words

“” “” “To postpone” “” “” “” “To postpone” “” “” “” To postpone “” “” “” “to postpone the results of the judges.” “” “” “To postpone the results of the Constitution.

Prosecutor General Usham, Al Jazeera’s government “decreased these allegations,” he said.

“There is absolutely no truth for the claim that the executive authorities (the judiciary) of the OJSC (the judiciary).” “The suspension corresponds to the law and … any suggestions of the latest motives are firmly rejected by the government.”

The lawsuit, however, attracted criticism of the United Nations and law groups.

Margaret Satterthwaite, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judge and Lawyer, last month, on the interactions of the three judges, said they were aimed at violating the trial against the Supreme Court.

“The disciplinary trial of the Supreme Court, the judges, only due to the wrong behavior or incompetence, it seems to be rejected in accordance with the constitutional or impartiality, in accordance with fair procedures,” he said. “Pressure of suspects, disciplinary judgments and research may interfere in the independence of this body.”