The best soldier is losing a paving work of war crimes

The best of Australia’s best soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has lost its complaint against the decision of a significant behavior committed by war crimes.

In 2023, a judge claimed that the News Roberts-Smith claiming that the four unalued Afghans of the Victoria cross buyer were killed, Mr. Roberts-Smith claimed to make legal mistakes.

The civil court for the first time in history that any court evaluated the allegations of war crimes by the Australian forces.

On Friday, one panel of three federal judges in force in force.

Mr Roberts-Smith, who left the defense power in 2013, protects the innocence and was not accused of any of the allegations in the Criminal Court, where he had a higher load of evidence.

Former special forces sued three Australian newspapers in a number of articles, which claimed in Afghanistan in Afghanistan, as part of the LED military coalition of the United States.

As soon as the articles were published in 2018, Mr. Roberts-Smith was awarded the highest military honor for the Taliban fighters, who died alone to the Special Air Service (SAS) Plato.

The 46-year-old claimed that the alleged crimes were legally or did not occur in general, and did not happen, he violated the statements of the documents.

Some of his slander – some called the “trial of the century” in Australia and lasted more than 120 days and now have a cost of $ 35 million ($ 22.5m; £ 16.9m).

In June 2023, the Federal Court Justice Antony Besanko, Age, Sydney Morning Herald and Canberra Times, Mr. Roberts-Smith committed unarmed Afghan prisoners and civilians and civilians and civilians and civilians.

He also found that Mr. Roberts-Smith was lying to threaten the wrong facilities and witnesses threatened.

Additional claims that punched the boyfriend, threatened peers, and the other two crimes were not proven to the “probable balance” standard required in civil cases.

Being the “heart” of the appellate, Besanko’s presumption of Mr. Roberts-Smith’s innocence, lawyer Bret Walker, SC said.

When engaging in civilians who attract serious claims and accepting the findings, there is a legal principle that referees are required to continue.

Mr. Walker claimed that the evidence of the evidence provided by the newspapers shortly after the required standard.

This broken news story is updated and more information will be broadcast in a short time. Please update the page for the full version.

You can get breaking news about a smartphone or tablet through BBC News Application. You can also watch @Bbbcreaking x To get the latest warnings.