Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
US President Donald Trumps Suggested “Golden Dome” missile defense systemCanada is interested in unification, questions about the cost and expediency of the project, as well as concerns about space-based weapons competitions are being increased.
Trump’s plan was modeled after the iron dome, which protects Israel, a smaller land mass, a smaller land mass – a smaller land than Vancouver Israel.
The iron dome was founded mainly for protection from low-flying threats such as short missiles, mortars and shells Trump and other best US officials say The proposed golden dome will block firing missiles from other countries and space, future technologies that bring together existing technologies should still be developed.
A professor of a political science at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo talks about Alistair Edgar, Ont, Trump, the space-based detection and grip that will result in more weapons in space.
“The enemies that do not like this idea can put their weapons into space to destroy the satellites we will use,” he opens the opportunities for space-based weapons competitions.
“Currently, no one is thinking of armed area. Some people hide some things there and condemn them when they do.”
Clock | Carney tells about the potential role of Canada in Golden Dome defense system:
In response to a reporter’s question on Wednesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney said the US project “does not intend to put a price tag,” the US project was known as the US project, known as the golden domestic. Speaking at a press conference on parliamentary Hill, Carney said that the missiles are a serious threat to Canada.
China expresses Russian concerns
The United States has the most developed military space capacity of Russia, but many other countries develop their own space weapons, a Latest report from Secure World Fundnon-profit dedicated to promoting the peaceful and sustainable use of a foreign space.
If the dome is built, Edgar can design any country that does not want to fight against him to fight against him.
He says that the idea that the countries with nuclear weapons are afraid of using each other can be “mutually confidently guaranteed destruction”.
“Will China invest in its own version, as well as to attack technologies to attack the US systems?” asked. “There’s a mess in a mess.”
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said China was China on Wednesday “Serious concern” The golden dome was about the proposal and left Washington to increase Washington’s “strong attack” and increase the risks of the foreign space and weapons.
A Kremlin spokesman said such a program could force talks between Moscow and Washington About control of nuclear weapons in the near future.
Asked about the project, Canada Prime Minister Mark Carney, said that participation was discussed at a high level with US officials and will be evaluated.
He said that the missile defense, including “very distant future, can come from space,” the Canadian government is taking seriously.
“We know that we have an ability, if we choose so much, it is something we have to complete with investment and partnerships.”
Can even be set up?
Speaking with CBC news, experts are an unrealistic of the three-year schedule for the construction of the Trump, and a 20-year-old framework with EDGAR can be more possible, potentially $ 1 trillion.
The Congress Budget Department also evaluates the project Hundreds of billions can be a lot The United States will develop more than $ 175 billion and 20 years.
“We are talking about a lot of futuristic, massively expensive and only transparent measurement and technical experience, which will participate in such a system,” Canadian Defense Minister Peter Mackay told CBC Power and Politics.
Clock | Former Defense Minister discusses the Golden Dome proposal:
Ottawa, as US President Donald Trump approves the potential of the ‘Golden Dome’, and former Defense Minister Peter Mackay, who can look like Canada.
Buy buying requires budget approval on many presidential terms, PatryCJA Bazylczyk, Software and Research Center in Washington Rocket Defense Project in the Center for Rocket Protection
“It really depends on how many administrations over many administrations and to treat a kind of administration and financing and make it a bipartisan issue to really prioritize the homeland,” he said.
Writes about US defense policy Toronto’s Woodsworth College University Professor, Beth Fischer, is difficult to assess the expediency of a project using unusable technologies.
The former US President Ronald Reagan said that in 1983 when he was proposed by the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), similar questions and criticism.
The SDI intended to place missiles and powerful laser weapons in the lower ground, which can hold a ballistic nuclear rocket launched from anywhere.
However, the idea did not result in any results, mainly due to the tech barriers, high prices and concerns, which has been abandoned since then.
“At that time, the technology was criticized because there was no existence and intended to continue to develop a long time,” he said.
“And this time we have the same concerns this time.”
What is the hassle in Canada?
However, the Fisher does not reject the value of the proposal, and Canada should think about long-term security, especially as sensitive to environmental change.
It is also important to protect the satellites we depend on daily life – at least four countries – the United States, Russia, China and India.
How often will it be protected from Canada with the golden dome, and there are still open questions, and how much the country’s role will be.
Listen | Is it a past time in Canada to revive the missile protection?
Quite1:19:03Does the US missile call on the defense system?
Canada is already watching the North American sky through the Norade and feeds the information on the US missile-defense program.
However, Canada never officially joins the US national missile defense program in the 2000s, meaning, meaning, meaning, or can not participate in any potential decisions on the launch of the holiday against an apartment object.
Fisher suspect Trump can perform a Canadian idea called “Fair Share” in the press to calm the cost of the cost of the project.
The potential of the Canada can attract possible economic benefits from research and development, but it will not be significant in spin-off and will depend on how a large role in the country.
“If we behave like Junior partners, we will not work on the most innovative or most advanced technologies,” he said.
Canada rejected Reagan’s SDI in the 1980s, but Fischer, England, Germany and Italy said it was not rewarded for an important reverse.
“Now I would say that most countries of the participating countries will say that they have made a decision made to us to the extent that they hope.
