Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
[ad_1]
Google returned to the Federal Court to return the US Internet empire at the same time.
Legal and technological threats facing Google on Friday, legal and technological threats, the company’s dominant search engine identifying the changes in the region, will determine the illegal referee Amit Mehta’s illegal declaration was declared, which is declared
The brand evidence presented during the last three-week listening, the judiciary lawyers, in Google to lock the search engine in SMART devices, in Google, the fact that they require a ban on smarters and their Chrome browser, trying to convince Mehta to order a radical shake.
Google lawyers need only minor discounts, especially as triggers in artificial intelligence improvements in artificial intelligence, alternative, talking search choices, the next technology front will work in the next technology.
Mehta pointed out that he was looking for a medium place between the two camps, when he wanted a medium place between the two camps, asked the lawyers for both sides.
“We do not watch the design Google,” the judge said that the target should be “Kickstart” to dominate the search giant of the Kickstart opponents.
After the closing arguments, Daylong will spend more than the annulment of a decision planned to leave more than a few months before Labor Day (September 1) in the United States. Google promised to admit a step that the judge, which is branded by the search engine as a monopoly.
AI connective point
Both sides of this demonstration agree that the AI is an infection for the future of the industry, there is a difference of opinion that the turn will affect Google.
The Justice Department, AI technology itself, claiming that it will lead to the power of Google, must be struck into a search engine in a search engine, which is the main reason for Alphabet Inc., worth $ 2 trillion.
On Friday, Mehta, Mehta said that the EU decision was not included in the upcoming judgment to show how much the EU’s potential would be to shake the search market. “That’s what I struggle,” he said early in the court.
Justice Prosecutor David Dahlquist called on the judge to not allow Google to be opened to compete in the search market and not allow Google to benefit himself in the AI race.
Google applied AI to help the AI to convert the search engine to an answer engine, as the main gateway of the Internet, Openai and confusion to help the Internet continues as the main gateway of the Internet.
The Department of Justice said that Google CEO browser will be among the most effective counter-events against Google to establish Sundar Pichai’s Sundar Pichai about 20 years ago and will be among the most effective counterparts against Google.
Executors of both Openai and perplexed, if he ordered the sale of Mehta last month, the bidders for the chrome browser said they wanted for bidders.
Google’s lawyer John Schmidtlein, on Friday, “should start to work for the” start of work “to their products to their products, to be able to enable the courts to be unfair to Google’s innovations.
The debate in the fate of Google also made opinions from Apple, mobile applications, lawyers and the beginnings.
Google’s standard search engine is a 10-year ban on iPhone and other devices, a 10-year ban on a 10-year ban offered by a 10-year ban, which captures the proposed 10-year ban.
Apple said that the company will strengthen the company because the company’s research is prone to its research and the ban can be stronger because they can be stronger. Cupertino, Cupertino, the company also said that the referee would not have to compete in order to compete against Google to compete against Google.
In other documents, a group of lawyers, the judiciary of the judiciary, the company offered the proposed chrome, the company will be an improper punishment that will cause unfounded government intervention.
Meanwhile, the authorities of the former Federal Trade Commission were warned about another proposal to share Google’s information with opponent search engines, Google’s information, “they provided with the expected users’ personal information, security and management.”
Application Union, a group representing a large program developer, as well as Mehta, relevant effects that are relevant to Ripple effects, they advised not to accept the changes offered by the Justice Department.
Google, lobbling on the way to work in the work of the Justice Department, will become more difficult to achieve the goals, the App Association wrote. If the group argues, “Developers will be eliminated with uncertainty if Google is separated from each other.
[ad_2]
Source link
