Britain launches Defense-Based Repair – But is it very little?

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned Britain’s defense spending, warning Britain’s protection spending on Monday.

“We continue to fight the war,” the government said that the government and instability created by Russia and other enemies were called the great-awaited “Strategic Defense View”, saying the great-awaited “Strategic Defense View”.

Britain’s defense plans include 12 new nuclear attacks, including 12 new nuclear power boats, including the production of missiles and ammunition Strengthening the capacity of cyber war.

Starmer will rise to 2.5% (GDP) to 2027 to 2027 of the British defense spending, and “when allowing the economic and financial terms” will increase “Ambetti” to 3%. Born Calculations As the share of GDP’s protection expenditures, 2% in 2014 offers to be 2.33% in 2014.

One of the priorities of the UK was to strengthen the NATO coalition, the Prime Minister said that Britain’s defense policy will be “first NATO.”

NATO wants 32 members Try to spend 5% of GDP in defense Until 2032, security-related infrastructure and subsequent time when they met on June 24-25, this is ready to push this goal.

Analysts and economists claim this while doing this Britain’s Defense Plans It is a pleasant news in uncertain times, as a result, very few, very few, very small, and it can be potentially difficult to give financial restrictions in the UK

Because the trump is the last one in power, defense costs among NATO members have dred up sharply. In 2018, the height of the reservoir of the Leader of the White House by a military unit, only six member states and the United States, including the United States, met 2% target. Compared to 23 members in 2024 According to NATO data.

Some are very coincided and the main economic forces, including Poland, Estonia, the United States, Latvia and Greece, including the main economic forces, including Spain and Italy, are among the limits of the contribution.

NATO member has not yet reached 5% spending purpose Trump or NATO Secretary General is offered by Mark Rutte.

Some NATO allies have already reacted to the UK’s Minister of Defense in 2012 with the defense minister with the defense spending on the 2012 defense spending – The BBC was reported to say that this figure was “old news”.

Starmer refused to increase the open schedule (2029-2034) to 3%, as the British in the next parliament may increase defense costs to 3% (2029-2034), he said that it would be an obligation to a precise date before this obligation would be the better. “

The European Aerospace and Defense Sector, Stoxx 600 aerospace and defense index rose 0.45% on Monday.

However, the spending plan is unequivocally positive for the sector … The strike will gradually and be loaded “, Loredana Muharremi, capital analyst on Monday

He noted that Britain’s defense plans were “investing in the nuclear navigation, expansion of submarine fleets, expanding under the Aukus program, and investment in scale ammunition and cyber and long-term holiday capabilities,” Trump and NATO were wider defense ambitions.

“The British government is sufficient to meet the national security goals of these spending purposes, which is still short of NATO and the United States, can be expected to be expected by Trump management to 3% faster than 3%.”

Defense experts argue, meanwhile, the protection will be more money and will not be humble.

“2.5% of GDP is the target of spending, at least” transformation “, at least the current state of the Armed Forces,” Matthew Savill, Institute of Royal United Services (Russian) He said in analyzes Review.

“It is necessary to transform and cut the armed forces and significantly reduce the armed forces in some areas in other areas,” he said.

Several billion pounds per year, a few billion pounds should be used primarily to support weapons and other weapons, infrastructure and other weapons, infrastructure and logistics, personnel and employers.

However, “This” is more likely to “this” a noble scholarship or number of “this” is more than a “radical” to “radical”. “

“Defense is here for the promise of providing new opportunities by the early loss of others due to budget pressure.”