The oddest job is fired in the history of cricket


The cricket often comes with a fairly strange sport, sometimes a little strange, sometimes a little strange, as the tradition is often adjusted by the tradition. This is especially true when it comes to rejection, because it has left cricket, bending, deduction or lbw, riflamers, commentators, players and even their heads, even subjects and even subjects; However, the strange dismissal in the history of cricket proves that the game is never short in unexpected surprises.

Inzmama- 2006

Starting from Inzamam-Ul-, when he started a shooting with a bat with the bat with the bat with the bat with Raina, he took part in one of the strangest work. Although he did not actually attempt a run, he was ruled out to “prevent the area.” All this threw from Raina to the end of the attacker, which tarnishes the position of entrance. My Inzamam was in front of the stumps, directly on the way to the awkward throwing. The ball cut the bat and stood as if playing a stroke. Because of the years, this moment, in many matches between Pakistan and India, it turned into a part of the folklore and was so strange cricket bet The sites could predict what happens.

Hemulal Yadav 1997

In 1997, the Ranji Cup among Tripura and Orissa, Indian cricket Hemulal Yadav, was fired in one of the rarest ways in cricket sports. In first-degree cricket, the rules say it’s three minutes to get a watchman after dismissal. However, Yadav, in time failed in time and was automatically given by Umpire. But it was stemmed from laziness, as you are likely. Tripura was nine wickets at the moment and when the next fruit was time to buy the area, he left the stadium – was unaware of the team.

Kevin Pietersen 2007

Only fourth in the history of the test cricket, called ‘Hit Wicket’, Kevin Pietersen, Kevin Pietersen, all circles for West India, was excluded in the 3rd test in the 3rd test in the Old Trafford. The Bouncer ended the cutting of the Pitersen’s helmet, when he wanted to prevent the ball. But as the helmet fell, unfortunately landed in their stumps. Although neither Pieters, nor the wound did not contact the stubs, he was still given and dismissing the controversial dismissal was the main talk point for the rest of the test.

Kurt Wilkinson 2002

Cricket is not allowed to hit players twice in rule booklets. However, the local West Indies touched the ball twice in the same part of the same plays in 2002, Wilkinson immediately refused the oddest and unique ways of firing the other and the other.

Andrew Synds 2006

In 2006, an Australian body of Sri Lanka, the Australian Majority Andrew Syminds would continue to hit the ball directly from Jehan Mubarak. However, as athlete Michael Clarke, athlete Michael Clarke, is currently lined up. Due to the flight of the ball, a simple catch for a simple catch, Clarke’s shoes jumped in the perfect way for diligently. Although the ball first focuses on him, the failed example of the ball, which did not touch his rapid reactions and the ground, caused a failed sample to capture the singmons. Given that this is only one of the only two wickets to the Mubarak’s career, this was more strange.

Villiers

In 2008, Heastas Star Ab de de de de Villiers were caught in a test match between Bangladesh and South Africa. Although it seems simple enough, de Villiers, no balls of the ball, no balls, no significantly changed. This should bounce more than 2 times to be the ball of the cricket manual, since the ball is twice before shrinking. Due to the simple misunderstanding of the rules, Ab de Villiers do not spare the place in front of the stumps not to be legal.

Azhar Ali 2018

Pakistan’s Azhar Ali was in the center of a very embarrassing dismissal in a test against Australia in 2018. After hitting the ball towards the borders, Ali stood in the middle of the pitch, thinking he hit four. But what it does not matter is that one of Australia has been able to succeed in sweeping to a stop before the border, and the beginning of the higher the cache to set the ball before the celebration. It is not suitable, the batting partnership was confused in confusion in each other, while the happening was dismantled when they did not understand.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *