Million-Dollar Project Aims to Expose Bad Medical Research

Recakaction A new initiative of the guards behind the clock is to target a defective or fake medical research for about $ 1 million melodies.

This Center for scientific integrity The draft medical evidence has made two years of effort to identify medical research that negatively affect health guidelines and to make sure people heard of it.

The project is equipped with a $ 900,000 grant from the main team, which is an open philanthropist and five investigators, will use the trial to determine the problems in the scientific article and will use the most advanced site for the scientific spectator.

“We have been established as a house for the reclamation of the center for the scientific integrity, but we hope we can do more in the field of research accountability,” and re-executive director, a post declare grant. “The medical evidence project allows us to spread critical analysis and findings.”

According to NatureThis is concerned about the defective and fake documents, because more statistically, the findings are connected by more than one job. If a research of one or two wheels transforms it into a meta analysis, they can watch scales on health policy.

In 2009, a European leadership was later based on the use of beta-blockers during the heartbreaking operation, based on the survey and millennium research. Years later, an independent study said that the management could lead to 10,000 deaths a year in England.

James Heathers prevents the team’s plan, the team’s plan, which leads the plan, anonymous whistlebars, which led by a scientific integrity consultant and pay Peer reviewers to check their work. They aim to identify at least 10 defective meta analysis in a year.

The team wisely chooses the moment. As reported as gizmodo before, EU Created Junk Science The academic digital ecosystem shows the conference proceedings to the magazine reviewed by the conference. A study published in Harvard Kennedy school, one-third of the wrong information of exemplary data, two-thirds of the documents received through Google scientists, even the main scientific authorities have even the GPT created. About 14.5% of these fake studies are directed to health.

This is especially exciting, Google scientists do not notice between studies and preprints, student documents or other less serious work. And once in such bycatch meta analysis or by reference by clinicians, it is difficult to open the results. “There are original research,” a researcher told Gizmodo, “There is a risk to make decisions based on incorrect information.”

We have already seen how nonsense can pass. Springer Nature in 2021 Retracted over 40 The documents from the magazine magazine in Arabia are read as a crazy libs. Last year, the publisher fronts had to take a paper with an anatomically impossible photos of EU rat.

We entered the digital fossil period, the start of AI models prepared on web-broken data to protect and promote as if vhiveling expressions in a real scientific point of view. For example, in the beginning of this year, a group of researchers gathered elegant words from a biology paper, including the results of large language models, including 1959 biological paper, Openai’s GPT-4O.

In this climates, the purpose of the medical proof project feels more than cleanliness. The team deals with the selection of defective data in a straight landscape and can be more real health results if there are many health results.