China wins space in space as USA’s commercial satellite funds cut

The dominance of the United States in the United States served for a long time as a great power to American Warfighter. Today, it is increasingly increasing by commercial space companies to satellite-based Internet and global telecom networks, developed by the prevailing technologies – daily ground surveillance. These opportunities help our troops, detect, detect and move faster than moving.

But as Global tensions are escalatingThe American management is at risk from shortened decisions from both external enemies and at home.

May 14 hearing, rep. Seth Moulton warned that the National Intelligence Office (NRO) was funded Trade Satellite Images in the next financial budget. These proposed cuts are not only a threat to our warrior and national security – the vitality of the US trade sector also endures.

‘Mind-Boggling’: President of the Space Forces, a resistance warning on Chinese ability to disassemble US satellites

Targeting the warfare area, today’s missions, today’s missions are increasingly reliant on the coverage of a continuous trade satellite. This ability to weaken, reduces more slow decisions, efficiency and more risk for us and allied forces. These cuts threaten to break our intelligence abilities and weaken our edges in a global space race.

China never wasted. Chang Guang Satellite Technology Co. (CGST), a company-funded commercial footage company, operates more than 100 satellite and advanced communication architectures and placed to break the markets, form global standards and collect global standards. This is a significant progress China’s satellite image And according to communication opportunities and Western intelligence officials, Chinese trade satellites were used by Russia, including nuclear power plants, including nuclear power plants, including nuclear power plants, including nuclear power plants.

This is part of a disturbing trend: the authoritarian regimes are rapidly armed quickly than we protect against him.

Unfortunately, our allies and partners often receive this American production technology faster than our government. Allied defense agencies are more effectively with many organizations that help develop US commercial images and analysts. Recently Rand Corporation asked Ukraine’s use US trading space technology As an asymmetric preference over Russia. Their report concluded: “US politicians must continue to develop strong contract regulations with commercial space providers.”

Fewer than 1% of the United Defense and Intelligent Community Budgets are spent on commercial space. Even the general intelligence officials also recognize the problem. National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, recently noted that government agencies often develop more efficiently in the private sector in the private sector. Although trading satellites can create daily data, the government only uses one part. Decision-makers in NRO and the National Local Prison Agency (NGA) are still prioritizing the classified satellites to build and spend more comparable trading alternatives. They create great, sensitive targets for enemies, the ability to use dual use is more practical and perceptible.

After the Cold War America got it Space preference He came to trust Russian missiles to carry and move American astronauts. We cannot afford the same mistake as trading satellite technology. Although Bipartisan is supported for commercial space innovation, it must now be adapted with solvent and sustainable investment. Instead of cutting Vital initiatives, successful programs such as electro-optic commercial layer (EOCL) should be protected and expanded. Procurement processes should be modernized between defense and intelligence agencies to keep up with fast-moving private sector technologies. This means sending a clear, consistent requirement signal that does not steady resistant resolutions or the last minute reverses.

Cut support for trade space assets contradicts President Trump’s national security priorities. The President recognized the place as “the next warfare battle domain”. His leadership supported the private sector innovation and gave the executive commands that prefer commercial first purchases.

However, the rhetoric is not enough – we need structural reform. Congress often builds trading programs for recipes for recipes for resources to re-set the intention and resources for the agency. This raises a critical question: does it mean to host commercial financing inside institutions that are institutionally encouraged to build their satellites?

Click here for more Fox News Review

The Congress should consider this funds to be able to access and reach a commercial opportunities in the government. Agencies can only focus on subtle systems, they will only be able to build, trade providers, and offer sustainable solutions that can quickly adapt to combat needs.

During the second term, President Trump has a great opportunity when the American space dominance is in another period, Warfighter’s means and information. However, this is the hinges in the commercial space sector, which is supported by the future intelligent, forward thinking policy.

Click here to get FOX News app

Leaders in Washington should decide: Dished thought to allow the world’s best space technology to keep the fightfield and capture China’s top hand? Or will this White House invest in America commercial space opportunities and provide our leadership in the most critical in the 21st century?

The answer must be open and important.