Labor made a great game. Not sure?

Unlock the editor’s digestion free

FT editor Roula Khalaf, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Not fun? Because you sincerely, you have seen the show now. Finally, we waited for a year to see the great plan voters about a year. After taking the Hefty tax and some political incorrect steps, he dared to cheer in the Rachel Reves, the Commons Arena, but also a chance to ignite the eyes, but also.

So we had fun? Or to put another way, are we sure? If this is planned – and this is for this parliamentary expenditures, this parliament – its story has to bend the country.

The first thing to say, there are a few good things that will have a few good things in his statement – this is also considering the level of debt. The central operation is an economic and political argument that its mission is to invest in the nation’s fabric. It is a recovery confidence in the investment management by spending infrastructure closest to an economic strategy. The need to spend more capital is insignificant. From reservoirs to railways, England lost the art of the building. Long-term promised projects disappeared in a policy of brexit, pandemic and empty ads.

Special projects and public debt can be controversed due to the overall levels, but it was a great step in an £ 113 billion pound spriggage. Funding for transport, defense apparatus, nuclear power plants and other energy investments and social housing. The country goes to the regions of Boris Johnson to beyond London, this time, this time, this time, the necessary planning reform. These are great calls and Reives and Keir Starmer, they deserve to get credit for them.

However, there are three problems rising to the legs of the crowd. First, the main capital projects are going on for years. The country is getting used to the missing images when the money is tightened. Second, while waiting for these necessary investments, the voters still feel more pain compared to the cost of living and itching.

George is not comparable than the years of stiffness of Osborne. The money flows into departments, but at the levels that do not meet the needs of the employee deputies. The voters they are worried will not make a profit from this investment in timeAs they feel negative consequences of public expenditures daily and day.

If this solution corresponds to the folk mood in the crime and public order, for example, a miracle? There is a government, which wants to send fewer people in prison, stretching and insulting a lower level. Meanwhile, the enterprises will be worried about a chancellor to be forced to increase taxes more taxes to solve these political fears.

First of all, the cost of spending is the effectiveness of finding a deposit and deliver reforms that this government still owns. EU’s magic bullets, some promised effectiveness savings seem amazing: £ 9 billion in three years in a healthy service; Overall 13.8bn. The deposit is used to close close to £ 1 billion shelter hotels.

The execution will be everything. It is a basic priority and surprising, the main winner of the spending review. However, in almost a year, we still expect the 10-year NHS plan. Social care review will present ideas to better use the money from the existing money until 2026. Health Secretary Wes Street is one of the highest levels of social performers in the cabinet, but we should not see if it complies with the conversation of his walk.

Defense has done good deeds (although many more arguments are less than needed). However, cash will face a growing threat, weak procurement remains one of the last decades. The test will be more effective if this mod is more effective in how the money is spent more than their predecessors.

He may ask the Labor Party to be the stomach for the necessary welfare deposits. Does not offer the last backlings. Or investing in skills training is enough to ensure the construction of the Britain’s immigration to people, the construction of the construction and the construction of the construction. Critics as well as additional workplace regulation and tax growth can be raised at work that can lead to an increase agenda.

However, the reconstruction of intentions and instincts is mainly correct when trying to limit current expenses when investing in infrastructure. However, the political weaknesses of the labor remains these questions about this plans to knit a confident story around these plans and not to touch a confident story. Neither the reversion nor the sarmer command is neither public trust nor the present. Unlike Russell Crowe’s Gladiator, they do not play.

Therefore, this government is a very important thing, but as a political loan, we will look back in this government. Labor, this spent, has to hope that the public consciousness in the four years after the four years of public consciousness is a public consciousness to ensure that the country becomes a corner.

Labor made a great game. This is a decent plan, but now it’s down to execution. If you are not sure immediately, so far, these are not convincing.

robert.shrimsley@ft.com