Inside the AI Party at the End of the World

For $ 30 A cliff of the Golden Door Bridge, a million generations, AI researchers group, philosophers and technologists gathered to discuss the end of humanity.

The Sunday afternoon, called “worthy heir”, turned around the symposium provocative idea Entrepreneur Daniel Faggella: The developed EU “spiritual purpose” should create a strong and intelligent shape, “Humanity (humanity) prefer to determine the future of the future.”

Faggella made the day of the invitation. “This event is very directed to the posting passage,” he said, wrote to me through the X DMS. “He serves AGI forever as a means of mankind.”

Part of the participants can be described as a metaphoric, not a metaphoric, but a party full of futuristic fantasies, which discussed as a material problem. If you live in San Francisco and work in AI, this is a typical market.

About 100 guests Nibbled in cheese plates near the floor-ceiling windows near the floor-ceiling windows collected to hear three talks on the future of alcohol cocktails and intelligence. One participant made a reference from a shirt that says “Kurzweil is right” Ray kurzweilThe futurist predicting cars will surpass human intelligence in the coming years. The other “does this help us to be safe?” Wore a shirt that says? A thoughtful face is accompanied by emoji.

Faggella said this incident was the possibility of “the probability of humanity in major laboratories, and not talking about it, and the elusive musk referred to the early comments of technological leaders such as SAM Altman Demis HassabisIt was very clear about the possibility of killing all of AGI that killed us all. “Now the incentives should compete,” all a complete beur to build it. “(To be fair, musk He is still talking about risks Related to an advanced AI, though it does not stop the competition ahead).

Linkedin, Faggegella boast AI founders, a star-guest list of all the best Western AI laboratories and most of the important philosophical thinkers in AGI. “

The first speaker, Ginevera DavisiA writer located in New York warned that human values ​​cannot be translated into the EU. Machines never understand what is being conscious, he said, and it would not want to direct human choices to future systems. Instead, he suggested a loud view of “space alignment”, which can still look for deeper, more universal values ​​we have not discovered. His slides often showed an AI created image that appears as a techno-utopia appeared, a group of people gathered in a group of people in a futuristic city.

Critics of the Machine Consciousness will say that large language models are just a stochastic parrot, a metaphor by a group of researchers, a group written by some In a popular paper These llms actually understand the language and are only probable machines. However, this dispute was not part of the symposium that the speakers came to the idea that the super touch came and faster.