The Chatbot Disinfo Inflaming the LA Protests

Zoë Schiffer: Oh, wow.

Leah Feiger: Yes, exactly. Those who are already trump’s ear. This was widespread. Thus, people go to the GROK of the X and they “grock, what is that?” What did the grog say to them? No, no. Grok said they had no images from protests in LA. They said they were from Afghanistan.

Zoë Schiffer: Oh. Groc, no.

Leah Feiger: They do not have a valid support for “this.” It was really bad. It was really bad. Really, it was really bad. It’s not exactly, and so on. It’s not great.

Zoë Schiffer: I want to say that at the moment, do not start this moment, many of these platforms have systematically decided to make them more content, purposefully demolish the test programs. And then you add conversations to the mixture because it all uses and I think it can be really useful, incredibly confident. When they halluculate, they do this in a very convincing way. You won’t see me here that defending Google search. Absolute garbage, nightmare, but it becomes a little clearer, it is slightly clearer, in the absence of some casual, unopened blog, in the absence of an unlocked blog, and when it is not opened, Afghanistan’s photographs are the complete confidence that you see a photo.

Leah Feiger: Really worried. I want to say that it is hallucinating. Completely hallucinated, but with a drunk frat boy’s bitch, unfortunately, a merry-cornered in a party in your life.

Zoë Schiffer: Nightmare. Nightmare. Yes.

Leah Feiger: They “No, No, No. I’m sure. I’ve never been sure in my life.”

Zoë Schiffer: Absolutely. I want to say that, why do these wrong answers give such confidence? Why don’t you see them: “Well, I don’t know, maybe you have to check another places. It’s a few reliable place to search for this answer.”

Leah Feiger: Because they don’t do it. They do not accept what they do not know what is really wild for me. It is really done in a very job and discovered the latest research of AI search tools in the Digital Journalism Center in Columbia, the conversation is generally bad. It offers incorrect or speculative answers. ” Really really wild, especially when you think that there is so much article during the election, “Oh not, I’m not talking, and I’m talking about in politics.” Who are you, but now you are taking a lot.

Zoë Schiffer: Okay, I think we must take a break there and come back there. Back to Belly. Today, Leah Feiger, I join the string header editor-in-chief Leah Feiger. Okay, only outside checking the information and images, there were a bunch of reports that were misleading the Videos of AI. The protesters had a Tiktok account that could be able to download the videos of the National Security Officer soldier, who allegedly spelled fake and inflammatory, as one of the videos, “and one of the videos was” full of oil. ” So I do not know, such false footage feels a little more skillful when identifying such false images, but in one circumstance is difficult in a contextual environment as a video in X or Tiktok.