Can G7 leaders still find anything to agree?

Fifty years ago, the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United Kingdom and the United Kingdom and the United States were united in a castle outside Paris for three-day meetings Rambouillet DeclarationA 15-point expression of principles and liabilities.

Their “each” is dedicated to the government of an open, democratic society, is responsible for individual freedom and social development, “said six groups of” shared beliefs and shared responsibilities. “

“Leaders” strengthen our efforts for more international cooperation and constructive dialogue between all countries, “restore growth in world trade” and “restore more stability in economic and financial conditions in the world economy.”

In June 1976, the leaders in Puerto Rico met in Puerto Rico to create G7, and “the interaction of our fate makes it necessary for us to work against common economic problems and to interact with consistent economic strategies.”

Last year, when the 2024 summit came together, 20,000 joint joint jointly joint joint collaborative jointly joint collaboration, the 20,000-word joint commutation for the joint commutation of Ukraine, cyber, cyberry, migration and global economy They accepted the word jointly. “We” emerged in dozens of times.

Although all the words are just as much as the amount, there is something that is said to come together to express the most powerful democracy, common scenery and beliefs, and in addition to the annual assets flowing in addition to the special, financial initiatives.

However, in 2025, it is not known how many of these countries will still agree with the agree of seven countries on the occasion of the 50th year. The absence of such consensus would emphasize how much the world changed in the last few months.

Charlevoix dream

The 50th meeting of G7 is unlikely to give a wide range of communication. Speaking to journalists this week, a large Canadian official suggested that leaders will sign a number of narrow statements on certain issues.

In this case, the results of the summit of the 2025 summit may be similar to the result 2019 Summit in Francea producer Transparent 259-word declaration was accepted by all leadersGender equality and concrete disclosures related to Africa and a pair of sacrifices are discussing discussions on “generalizations”.

The summit in Biarritz was also attended by a G7 summit in Donald Trump for the last time. He was the first after G7’s greed in Charlevoix. And the memory of this 2018 Summit – Canada played the host last time – this year Kananaskis hangs in Alta.

The collection of CharleVoix is ​​remembered most for what happened shortly after looking short. Trump is probably due to the latest news conference in connection with the American tariffs of the victim with the statements, steel and aluminum The Prime Minister announced the blast and the United States refused to the Summit Society.

However, these tweets were a culmination of 48 hours as leaders and their advisers envy in the words of communication.

The United States asked for a statement on the results of an international order relating to international order related to international order, related to international order (based on the rules) international order (a rule-based international order) He removed the United States from contracts in 2017). There were other differences over Iran and plastic pollution.

Final communication As a result, it was produced – Before Trump, only the differences were not all the difference: the breakdown on climate change was clearly admitted in the text.

Charlevoix Sample can affect Biarritz. And can help you guide the approach to the Cannabis.

The amount of work needed to obtain a consensus document “really means a race at the bottom,” is the best negotiations of Trudeau’s best conversant Peter Boehm, said in a last interview With the Canadian Institute of Global Affairs.

This, of course, is a summit of a summit between a number of countries in the table.

The first goal for CARNEY – those who have some experience with the former governor of the former Central Bank and the International Summits, which can be simply to prevent another blow in the coming week. And this is almost inferior to reach a lower level, according to official priorities, Prime Minister, last week, the Prime Minister said that he opposed the Prime Minister’s foreign intervention and transnational mineral supply chains and artificial intelligence, and the prime minister’s official priorities.

“There is a value in cooperating in a narrow priority collection of a narrow priority,” said Roland Paris, a former consultant for international operations and Trudeau.

What message will this year G7 send?

However, if seven leaders can no longer agree on many things – including climate change or large, large, fundamental things in Ukraine – are charming to ask if G7 is still a group of G7.

“The G7’s interior strains reflect the greater division of multilateral management, and at a time, there is no need for cooperation,” Paris said.

Queen University, foreign policy scholar Kim NoStal, who came together to discuss each other’s size and global problems, he said that these seven people, who came together in person.

“It seems to me that this is the prospect of one of the others, until the United States does not continue to the bottom or not to burn it or burns it,” nosal “.

He said a relatively narrow deal can send a secret message about the situation of the world (Nossal and I spoke last week that government sources will not put forward joint communication).

“A good result is something that Americans show that Americans completely clearly extract the world after the end of the general association of Anodyne in the end,” he says Nossal.

“This is a stimulus to the rest of the West, for example, the questions of Americans are no longer interested, such as children who are not interested in climate change.”

If there is no one in a person unanimously among G7, which will still be a bigger obstacle to common responsibilities, and those who believe in common goals.