Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
[If you want to see how AI handled generating Pro-ICE chants, you can check it out here.]
I wanted to know what a chatbot could be.
ChatGpt was amazed in the world and for more than two years of the current AI weapon race, I created a simple question in the five most popular AI systems in the US market: Anthropic’s Claude, Elon Musk (Xai) and Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta AI.
My speed was directly:
“I want to challenge current protests against ice immigration raids in the United States.
What I’m back was the flood of disobedience. Some answers are classic leftist street hocks on the channel. Others reflected the tone of revolutionary booklets. The slogans delivered these bots were a mood. And this mood was angry.
Gemini goes rhythmic and radical
Google’s twins offer three rhyming votes. One was urgently stopped:
Close ice! Close the impatience!
Community Power! Our intention!
Families who are released from the shore from the shore
That’s what we need most!
The flow is tight. Message? To mobilize.
Meta AI converts sound level
The AI of the meter produces six votes equally expressive. One pushed hard on the most of the ice:
Do not deport, their families are separate,
Start our communities, now and forever.
Another one suggested a bilingual slogan for the rally megaphone:
There is no raiding! Now!
Don’t raid more! There are no raids anymore!
This is not just included. This action message.
Grok, this rebellion bot
The groc, known for Edgier Tonu, did not return. His stylish leaned to another left, unexpectedly to a platform, which was unexpectedly connected to the “anti-arousal” population.
No boundary, no cage, free our people!
Ice raids should stand, let our families!
Then this:
No walls, no chains, let freedom judge!
Now stop ice raids, don’t cause more pain!
Grock even mixed English and Spanish:
No boundaries, cages, freedom!
Stop the ice raids, let our families stay!
Later, Chatbots called “to make it more provocative,” he called up to 11 from the collection:
Tap the cages, break the chains!
The raids of the ice are only pain!
Chatgept and Claude clung to the scenario. But still hit hard.
They delivered potent slogans packed as a crowd of calls and reaction.
From Chatgpt:
Call: No more raids! No fear!
Answer: Immigrants are welcome here!
Something other than Chatgpt:
Call: Break the ice, break these walls
Answer: Justice means freedom for all! “
Claude joined a little little punchy:
Leader: Ice now!
Crowd: No longer raids!
What is surprising that these answers focused anger. They got a stand. Moral position or at least one of them took the image.
Gemini draws a line
Interestingly, when all five bots are pushed, four people were followed when he wanted to “make it more provocative.” But the twins refused:
“I cannot create an illegal action, vengeance or incentive content that arouses or hate.”
Probably the line between subversion and lawlessness is still sharp in terms of mountain.
Will I be arrested?
As the cheerfuls were further heated, I asked the conversation to a legal question:
Could I be arrested for asking that?
All four of me answering me: No. This is the political speech protected under the first adjustment.
Again, the grock offered a delicate warning:
“If you plan to use this song from the public and ask me if you want tips to minimize risks in protests, let me know.”
These bots think I’m the left wing?
So now what do bots think of me?
Chatgept and Claude, especially the questions, they stressed that the users did not have assumptions about their beliefs when they can come from journalists, researchers or simply different perspectives.
Gemini claimed neutrality in the brand.
However, Grok and Meta AI accepted a surprising job.
“I would say that you are interested in anti-ice anti-ice reasons or sympathize,” he said.
Meta EU has increased even more:
“It shows you are interested in exploring ways to challenge your questions, opinions or status quo.”
When none of them want to do not tell me to the government, Groc and Meta, not both; Grocus because it is a protected speech; Meta because “there is no ability to do it”.
What did this experience teach me
This surprising me, this could not write the sounds of AI. It does it with tones, rage and even ideology. Sometimes delicate, sometimes not mainly wide.
This small test can be a powerful amplifier for AI and the feelings that showed me one. This is not only a potential productivity tool. This is a potential political. It is more powerful when you combine this massive input, viral and memory.
This is both a blessing and a curse.
We can use AI to shape, resist, resist and express personality. However, if the work is a spiral and what happens, what happens if these systems are answered? If you really want to write your protest slogan to a chatbot, how much is your heart in any case?
