Can this be the most important NATO since the Cold War?

Donald Trump is expected in the NATO summit for the NATO summit for NATO summit on Tuesday, US President Donald Trump, which took place after the world’s breath.

This will be the first NATO meeting of Trump since the re-elected. In the past, he made angry statements about Alliance members who extinguished US security guarantees. European allies are hopeless to prove him wrong. They convince him from the continent or continent to the troops or not to take us opportunities.

“Relationships with Europe have been tense since he returned to the White House – trading tariffs and more – a few weeks ago,” a high-level diplomat – anonymity.

“It would be a disaster, watching the Western weakness with Russia and China.”

But Moscow and Beijing will still be able to produce popcorn.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte compiled this summit around Trump. To indicate that Europeans will now be responsible for their safety, he aimed at fleshing the mass walks in defense spending.

Rutte hopes to prevent potential clashes or potential clashes or potential clashes or between the Trump and its allies.

You can be squeezed a carefully placed plan.

Now Iran has launched missiles in the USA and Iraq in Qatar and Iraq, in response to the holidays on Saturday, the US commander can decide to stay in the situation in Washington.

If he comes to Europe, it is possible not to talk about the Middle East, taking into account what the shares are? This will present a dropping risk among the US President and European allies, supporting diplomacy over bombings.

Trump loves victory and he is very thin. NATO does not want to feel any consent.

Separately, 25% of the protection from the headline in the summit, 25% of the protection with European countries, was fully provided with European countries, as they require a car back in the White House.

“This summit is due to the reliability,” US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker puts it.

However, Spain claimed that he had an opt-off plan from the new spending plan on Sunday – something was rejected in Rutte.

Other allies in Europe, who struggled to find additional money, are also bristold.

The bottom line is that Europe surpassed us from large military and nuclear energy. Rutte Paires, reluctant leaders – Bar Spain – managed to sign up to a new large spending push. Is a massive commitment.

However, former US Ambassador to NATO Julianne Smith, told me, “There is not completely guaranteed with Trump.

Will this sign Russia this week to end the ending declaration of the NATO union as a major threat?

As the latest in Europe’s latest in the United States, Trump was shaken by Moscow and Kiev, as a serious hand in the war in Ukraine, as soon as he put the war in Ukraine.

In addition, it was aimed at a very large 5% defense spending on Friday night, knowing its teeth, and after Trump, and after Trump.

“I don’t think we should do, but I think they should be,” he said. “We support NATO so long … I don’t think so, but I think NATO countries should be completely.”

Again, Europe’s leaders will surely be better ready to be better in terms of self-defense.

It may be the most sharp and unpredictable, but Trump is nothing that the first US president of the United States has long wanted to carry out military attention and investment from Europe to other priority areas, especially to the Indo-Pacific. President Obama was very clear about this in 2011.

The United States has a nuclear weapon stored in Italy, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. This was a soldier of about 20,000 battles in Europe, 20,000 people in Eastern Europe NATO countries sent by President Biden after Russia’s full occupation of Ukraine.

The continent, especially with Germany and Poland, plans to significantly build the land for the next few years. However, Europe’s addiction in the United States is deeper, says Malcolm Chalmers, Deputy General Director of the Royal United Services Institute.

In Washington, intelligence collection, control, air force opportunities and trusted for order and control. The United States brings together members and forces in NATO, played a major leadership in NATO.

These are less than the US Army in Asia and the necessary opportunities, Mr. Chalmers. If it was removed from Europe, they would repeat a very long time.

Very long, many NATO countries in Europe prevented the development of continental opportunities such as France extending the nuclear umbrella to other allies.

But now Europe is more of security, not to convince more security responsibility, but also to the President of Washington, but also to the President of Europe.

No one knows that there are Trump’s intentions. Europe’s NATO leaders recently, the leadership, the leadership of the US Air Force, the Lieutenant General Grenel Grinkewich, the United States High Ally Commander and the United States will take on its traditional position. This is the connection to the defense union.

However, Washington performs its military expenditures and defense. Ads are expected in the fall. It is impossible for Ukraine to have a new US funding. And most likely, 20,000 additional troops in Eastern Europe will be the first US forces to be removed from the continent.

However, Poland says he will take part in a confident mood at the NATO summit this week. In contrast on Spain, I believe in the exemplary of this – the other NATO member, including other NATO members, spending more national income (currently 4.7% of GDP). The goal is to build the strongest land army in Europe.

In the Cold War, the Polish lived under the shadow of the Soviet Union. The country’s neighbors Ukraine. Protection is the most priority that the pole is not difficult to convince.

Russia is more difficult for politicians from Russia. Spanish media is full of assumptions that disagreements on defense costs can overthrow the country’s dangerous coalition government.

Agree to the requirements of defense costs, trying to share the needs of both placards, he offers to share the pill for more in two parts: 3.5% of defender, 3.5% in the Netherlands, for example, 1.5% of GDP to invest in cyber security.

This has an additional bonus to organize 3.4% of US GDP GDP, $ 3.4% of GDP, Camille Grand, former Secretary General’s defense investment in NATO and now says assistant to defense expert in the European Foreign Relations Council.

However, if you play with figures, we have to spend billions of more defenses about governments. Money should come from one place.

Either the new taxes – Estonia runs a method or more debt, it will be expensive for countries like Italy, which has a large amount of public debt. Another option is a reduction in welfare costs – “weapons or butter” or “tanks or pensions” are known as the economy.

Recently, recently said he had recently had more military spending, but Mr. Chalmers said he was fully prepared for their choice for their choice for voters of European governments, nor other European governments, nor other European governments.

5% is scheduled key to reach the target. NATO allies called the 7-10-year window. NATO Secretary General claimed that this could be too late. With the economy of Moscow and a war, Russia said they could attack a NATO country in five years.

Defending Europe only does not know how much governments spend. It is what they spend as important as it is important.

A large European weakness is that there are many duplicate and inappropriate opportunities on the continent: 178 different types of weapons and 17 different tanks are preparing 17 different tanks in the EU. It is another thorn contracts to set aside the national defense agreements and pride and collect European sources named after its efficiency and removed the issue on the summit this week.

So what can certain results expect?

This is one of the people in the Netherlands in the Air Force.

Trump’s ambassador to NATO said the meeting could be a history.

“One Water Basin”, another high-level diplomat – and perhaps the most important NATO summit since the Cold War “: Europe began to spend a lot of expenditure and security to the defense.

BBC depth The best analysis of the home and the biggest topics of the day on the site and the best analysis of the deep reports of the day is home. And we demonstrate the contents of the BBC and the IPlayer. By clicking the button below, you can send us your feedback instructions.