Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Unlock the editor’s digestion free
FT editor Roula Khalaf, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
This assistant The UK government’s long-awaited industrial strategy was greeted with an unusual voice: polite applause and groups such as CBI and England. Rachel Reeves made a difference in taking into account the greed of Rachel Reeves, which results in personnel tax rises.
A new strategy aimed at promoting the high growth industry, including advanced production and life sciences, gave many things to ask. These include high-industrial energy costs for 7,000 intensively and financing more experiences and skills.
In addition, there is a surprising tone against a government that came to power that speaks of “missions” and a more strategic state. This rhetoric still prefers pure energy policy, but the lower adjustment of economic recipe for the rest, lower planning delays, more competition and higher private sector Productivity.
This Industrial strategyBut it’s not like we know. The British is the most radical post-elements of Britain to increase competition and productivity: Interventions of Margaret Tetcher, which interventions of the 1980s. Sir Keir Starmer, Prime Minister, write In this week of England, “both braces and weak,” are critical in FT. The 1970s, the 1970s, sounded like labor governments.
Reveves, Nigel Lawson last year, thought that the influential chancellor “played a little role in the formation of a market economy.” However, Tetcher and Lawson believed in a state that was actively regulated by liberalizing the city of London, including liberaling, and activated in stimulating competition. Lawson can sympathize with part of this week’s analysis.
He clearly listened to business leaders, including the insurer law and general, which observed the growth of all governments to the growth of all periods. Politics, also the chairman of the British Council of Economic Advisors, the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, who learned to grow Investment Stunts in Britain, has a sign of Prof. John Van Reene.
England There is more need Economist Yusif Schumpeter “creative destruction”, ineffective, higher growth, displacement of more productive companies, more productive companies. Instead of constant institutional change (everyone reminded of training and enterprise councils?) The main weaknesses remain.
In addition to I agree with his philosophy, there are other services to a 10-year-old plan approved by the private sector. Instead of the other meaningless rebranding of the Fresh Quangos and Business and Trade Department, I would support the next government’s next change and a decent strategy to end the next government.
The government’s narrows dictates its approach: Although the winners wanted to return with the state money, there are no deep pockets. Have loyal Over the four years, 86 billion pounds, adding £ 4 billion to an additional 4 billion pounds to invest in companies in the strategic sectors, but its expenses are otherwise modest.
This is important to direct attention: chose Eight Industry make up one-third of the economy. Some others, including the retail and hospitality industry, including the increase in national insurance. However, it is sensitive to prefer high productivity sectors that can grow further and create economic clusters.
Most governments fight successful companies and the failed of losers, especially in marginal constituencies. Collateral must fight for many development proposals, many development proposals to promote investment with the rules and planning laws chicken farm a Thames reservoir.
So the success depends on you to be brave. The advanced business investment target will be met if the investment target is up to £ 39 billion, up to £ 39 billion by 2035, only if dried barriers by former governments. The UK says the strategy, “Very efficient and overloaded”, strategy. Tell some adjustable Labor MPs.
But I love the ambition to solve the crisis of politics and to solve the flaws of England where others fail. It is a serious initiative in spite of the difficulties in practice. If the government means what he says and will fall on the forces, and give a chance to industrial strategy.
