Getty drops key copyright claims against Stability AI, but UK lawsuit continues

Getty Images, one of the most closely monitored legal battles in the London Supreme Court, which is one of the most closely monitored legal battles, which is one of the most closely monitored legal battles to develop AI companies.

The movement is not completely end – Getty still follows other claims, but also a separate court in the United States – but it emphasizes gray areas that cover the future owner and use of the content of the generative AI. Development also comes a day after a day The United States has passed to the judge by anthropic The copyright law violates the Copyright in a similar argument in connection with books on books without authorization of the EU.

Getty Sued Stability AI – AI Image Generator Fixed diffusion – in January 2023, after claiming that this stability is unauthorized by millions of copyrighted images.

Description Database also claimed that the copyrighted content was used to teach many works created by a stable diffusion. Some, Getty, and even they had watermarks.

Both of these allegations fell on Wednesday.

“The training claim could not be sufficient among the Jurisdiction of the British Jurisdiction for the Under British Jurisdiction and the law firm, in one partner EIP in EIP. “In the meantime, the speech claim may most likely determine the main part of the created models created in the pictures (such as a photographer).”

GETTY’s closing arguments said that the company’s lawyers had taken these claims because of poor evidence and information about stability. The company strategically moved strategically, which allows him to direct him and his claims to be the strongest and wider court.

What is the case in the GETTY case, claims for a secondary law violation, but also claims for a brand violation. In connection with the secondary violation claim, the AI ​​models themselves can violate the copyright law and use these models in England, while outside England can be imports of violating articles.

“The secondary violation is one of the most expansive, in the UK, ie, the models next to England, the articles that are brought to England to the UK,” he said.

A spokesperson for a statement to the TechCrunch, the beginning was pleased to see the decision to take more than one claim after the closure of Getty’s statements. “

The spokeswoman also noted that stability, GETTY’s trademarks and claims are confident that consumers do not comment as a commercial message of stability as a commercial message of stability.

Getty’s US section has sued the AI ​​in February 2023 for a trade brand and copyright infringement. In this case, he claimed that the AI ​​model was using 12 million copyrighted images to exercise the unauthorized. The company is looking for damage to $ 11,383 per violation that will reach $ 1.7 billion.

In addition, stability AI, a group of visual artists, along with three company’s court to violate the copyright of a visual artist, also called another complaint.

Getty’s pictures have Generative EU offer The Getty Istock uses AI models taught to stock photography and video libraries. The tool allows users to create new licensed images and works of art.