Meta Wins Blockbuster AI Copyright Case—but There’s a Catch

Meta has received the basis Great victory in copyright case On Wednesday, the Federal Judge decided not to violate the company’s law when the company teaches AI instruments in 13 unauthorized author books.

“The court has no choice to make the company’s copyright law by teaching the company’s copyright law by teaching the models with its books.” Because the bidders were harmful to the use of the books of meter, the bidders did not have enough evidence.

In 2023, a comedyer claims that the Meta authors, including Sarah Silverman, including the fact that technological Behemot’s work has violated the copyright. Cadrey v meta was one of the first types; Now there are dozens of AI copyright claims that pass through US courts.

Chabria stressed that the plaintiffs have sufficient evidence to show that the bidders are using the work. “In fact, to allow someone to deal with such behavior in any question, it has been significantly reduced in the decision on Wednesday,” he said.

This is the second largest dominant in the world of Copyright in the EU this week; Monday, Judge William Alsup controller The use of copyrighted materials to cultivate his AI tools in Anthrop was legal. Chabria referred to the summary decision of Alsup in the decision.

ChaBRIA stressed that the judge is based on a collection of special facts in this case, in this case, it turns out the door to leave the ANTA for other authors. “The results of this judgment are limited in the great scheme. This is not a class action, so it affects the rights of 13 authors -” This decision is not preparing to show that the use of copyrighted materials to cultivate its language models. “

This is a developing story. Please check again for updates.