Meta wins AI copyright case filed by Sarah Silverman and other authors

Federal judge has vince chabria controller In favor of 13 books, including Sarah Silverman He sued the company To teach the broad language model in the work done without execution. His court decided to summarize the meta, which means that the case does not reach the full court. Çhabria said that the meta Copyright did not break the law The bidders could not show enough evidence that the company’s use of the authors would be financially harmed.

In itself domination (PDF), Chabria, in most cases, copyrighted materials for the right to use copyrighted materials are illegal to pay copyright owners or paying copyright. “… With the preparation of generative AI models with copyright, companies will often shake the market to sharpen the market and thus shaken the incentive to create an old way for a person,” he wrote.

However, the court said the “decide to work in accordance with the evidence provided by the parties.” In this case, the plaintiffs claimed that the movements of meta could not be considered “fair use.” They said that the use of the metage of the work is affected by the company’s LLMA, LLAMA and the books of small text than their books. They also said that using their books for training without consent, they have reduced their ability to licenses their work for meta LLM training. The judge called both arguments “pure losers.” LLAMA said the books could not create enough text from the item to the plain, and the authors do not have the right to “work such as AI training information.”

Chabria wrote that the market was copying the market to create a product with similar works and thus creating a product that causes market dilution. However, the bidders intentionally touched the dispute and did not provide any evidence that the methane was diluted from LLM. Despite the ruling, it clarified his decision: only 13 authors in the court impact and “does not stand for the use of copyrighted materials with copyrighted materials to train its language models.”

Another judge, William Alsup, recently Sided by anthropic In class action claim, the company was brought by a group of copyright using copyright. Alsup provided the writers’ application and allowed the court to buy an anthropic for piracy.