AI might undermine one of the better alternatives to the Kindle

The derivative company rakuten selling eBooks and ereaders named Kobo, Amazon Kindle’s name to be a version more open and the author. However, a recent change in the company’s self-publishing is concerned that some writers can change the prestige. The company last month was updated Publishing platform that opened the door to the AI ​​feature on the platform. With June 28, the authors do not seem clearly what the authors want to say for Kobo’s futures.

For authors who are traditionally published (or abroad) both traditional and Offer a way to sell books without a representative office or publication. If they can provide their work and information and information needed to prepare a store page, they do not only do not only the author but not a marketplet, but not everything you need to sell their books.

It comes with a list of terms agreeing to sell in one of the platforms. The largest is the split of the sale. If an author sells $ 2999 or more dollars with Kobo writing labels, they keep 70 percent of their earned. There are two royalty options on the Kindle Direct platform significantly – there are 35 percent and 70 percent – but both are mixed Some can significantly reduce the income of the authors. The calculation account and exposure of duties prepare strong advantages for the platform they choose. However, the terms of the service in which their work is published – and probably undergoing less warning.

Engadget talked to the three authors who were surprised by Kobo’s test decision with AI. All of them published new service conditions due to a simple banner notice in the Kobo writing Dashboard. A month after the terms now changed the terms, the company cannot clarify how new conditions will apply to the existing hiring. It is also not a tool for the authors to give up. Anyone who uses any amount in Koboda is the best and just the choice to stop publishing there and probably extract the existing work from the platform.

The authors we spoke were surprised that Kobo did not pass the proposed changes in advance, as well as to work with the company’s AI. “I appreciate the transparency in the use of AI’s use,” Michel Manus, a fantasy author on Kobo’s platform, wrote to Engadget via e-mail. “I thought that they were very evaluated, the user’s base was the extent that the AI ​​did not like.”

The new terms of Kobo are open to say that the company does not plan to use the authors to raise the generative AI. However, combine the right to use “artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning algorithms or similar technologies”, including various exercises for “reading, analyze and process”, including

• “Increase the detection of works” with labeling and target customer recommendations

• For sale in the Kobo store “evaluates the appropriateness of the work”

• “Resources” as “resources” as “keywords, presentation content, target ads, customer engagement strategies and other materials”

• “Being good, help and accessance features”

The authors took the issue of the absence of appeals to them. What happens if the author tagged as a mistake like a genre as a genre when it fits more than each other? Or if the “presentation material” creates Kobo, if it contains a kind of hallucination? The biggest issue for the writers, Kobo’s AI is potentially potential for the places created. Amazon was carried out Using a series of a number or a number of readers, using a generative AI and found some authors’ EI samples

“We went immediately,” he said, Okay, we see what he tried to do, but we do not think that what you offer, “Delilah Waan, Fantasy and YouTube Creator” saying to solve the problem. Since its self-published authors include more sensitive to his audience, such issues can actually jeopardize this connection. “The authors often give impetus from readers to plot options and can only imagine what happened in a book, if only what happens in a book.”

All the authors admired the attempts to appeal to Kobo’s community complaints. Michael Tamblyn was sent by the CEO of the company in Bluesky Access to the logic included in the AI ​​paragraph in the company’s terms. In fact, Tambiln wrote, Kobo readers to connect with the authors and escape the copyright of the moderation process to facilitate the Kobo store. “Using the books of the authors, we were completely uninterested in creating new content and do not do anything that allows you to do it,” he said. “And we don’t want another one to do it because we are working on the book and we want to continue it.”

Do not agree to grown a generative AI with an author’s case, it is what professional writers are recommended to demand from publishers A professional organization that defends and presently participates for writers A claim against Openai. In the books, choosing to not grow a generative AI, Kobo starts right foot. The nutrition of what material nutrition of the AI ​​model still asks many questions. “Remember, all of the models are currently illegally trained and means all great LLMS [Large Language Models]”Maryam Rasenberg says the leadership of the authors, says Maryam Rasenberg.” Thus, they can use an AI system that is not one of the great LLMs, but the system they use can be based on one of the great LLMS. “

Kobo did not respond to a request for information about what LLM planned to use. The company promoted to contact them through the support email that the authors respond to complaints so far can be affected or incorrectly affected. The company says that the Kobo app describes the “beta feature” to create “individual recap”. It notes that this “is not interested in making all the summaries of the books.” Instead of this, Kobo plans to be specific to a reader in 150 words based on both pages studying and highlighted in the recent reading session.

Ebook platforms take a broad approach to AI. Authors that publish with Apple Book Platform rarely make rich It is completely optional to do so, but it is completely. Barnes & Noble’s press platform does not currently offer AI products. Amazon’s repetitions are currently the most invasive use of EBOK markets and authors of them. “We do not matter how much money we earn from Amazon. We hate our relationship with this,” Waan said. Self-publishing authors said they were afraid of the Cobo change, as most Amazon products are currently responses to the author. “I can’t describe how much Kobo succeeds, and how much we want for them.”

Each company is eager to push the AI ​​and how to push the boundaries of the subsidiary. Waan’s Hope now Kobo is engaged in a kind of open forum with the authors about the use of the proposed use for technology. “I think it’s really hard to decide as an author, ‘Will I pull my books?'” Waan said. “The minute you’ve taken your books, because you have to update all the connections, because you have to update all the connections. If you have any commercials, you need to take them. It should be difficult, the self-published authors will be compulsory.

If you buy something through a link in this article, we can win the commission.