Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
States and local governments will be limited to how they can adjust artificial intelligence Currently under an offer before Congress. AI leaders say the action can lead to the fact that the United States can lead in innovation, and critics can lead to more consumers for rapid growing technology.
This suggestionAs the House of Representatives passes, no state or political section “I cannot regulate artificial intelligence models regulating any law regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems or regulations regulating artificial intelligence systems or regulations.” In May, the house added this to the full budget bill, which covers the expansion of 2017 federal tax intersections and Are cut into services such as Medicaid and snap. Senate made some changes, ie, moratorium will only be required Countries accepting finance As part of $ 42.5 billion Broadband, capital, login and placement program.
AI developers and some deputies, federal actions, the United States, the United States, said the federal action should be necessary to ensure patchworking of various rules and regulations. Fast growth in a generative AI since Openai Chatgpt In late 2022, the scene was blown at the scene and manages technology in as much space as possible. Economic effects are also important The US and Chinese Race To see which country to prefer technology, the Generative AI, MPs were able to create other risks for the privacy, transparency and other risks.
“[Congress has] If there are no meaningful protective legislation for consumers in many years, Ben Winters, the Privacy of Ben Winters, EU and the American Consumer Federation does not provide information that no one else can act, it can not only benefit from technological companies. “
The efforts of states to limit the ability to regulate artificial intelligence can be said that more consumers protecting around a technology, which is increasingly undertaken to every aspect of American life. “There have been many discussions at the state level and I would think that this problem is important for us to approach this problem at a very level,” he said. “We could approach him at the national level. We can also approach the state level. I think we need both.”
Several states have already begun to arrange AI
The proposed language would apply any regulation, including the bar states, including those in the books. Exceptions are rules and laws that facilitate the development of AI and the same standards that make it similar to unusual models and systems that do not do similar things. Such rules are already beginning to open. The greatest focus is not in the United States, not in Europe, which is already in the European Union Standards for AI. But the states begin to take action.
Colorado a set of Last year, consumer protection will come into force in 2026. California, received more than one thing about the EU Last year laws. Other states often have laws and rules engaged in special issues like depths like or requires information about the training information of AI developers. At the local level, if used in the hiring of AI systems, some rules apply to potential employment discrimination.
“When they came to regulate the EU,” When the EU regulation comes to whatever they want, it is called on the map. So far, the State MPs presented at least 2025 550 offers Around the AI, according to the national conference of state legislation. Last month, the meeting of the Home Secretary Committee, Republican Jay Obernolte from California, said he wanted to advance the government. “We have a limited number of legislative runways to solve this problem before the states are very close,” he said.
Although some states have laws on books, not all did not come into force or any execution was done. The potential of a moratorium limits its short-term effects, Cob’s Zweifel-Keegan, Managing Director Keegan for the Union of International Privacy Specialists in Washington. “There is no application yet.”
A moratorium will probably be able to avoid government legislators and politicians and to prepare new rules. “The federal government will become a key and potentially sole regulator around AI systems,” he said.
What does a moratorium mean in the State EU regulation
AI developers asked for any guards consistent and corrected in their work.
“As a country as an industrial and one country, we need a clear federal standard,” We need Ai -ANDR Wang, the founder and CEO of Information Company EU April Hearing. “But we need us, we need a federal standard, and we preferred to prevent the result of this result.”
During the Senate Trade Committee Hearing in MayOpenai CEO SAM Altman, Sen Altman, a Republican TED Cruz from Texas, an Ab-Sty regular regulation system said to be “catastrophic,” he said. Altman suggested that the industry has developed its standards.
A Democrat from Hawaii, a Democrat from Hawaii, if the industry is enough to regulate itself, he said that something will be good at the moment. .
All AI companies support the moratorium. One New York Times OP-edAnthroping CEO Dario Amodii, said, “The federal government said,” The federal government should create transparency standards for AI companies. “The presence of this nationality standard not only to the public, but also how the congressional technology develops how technology is developing, they can decide whether another government activity.”
Concerns, which use them in interaction with consumers and the companies developed by the companies developed by “Payers” and “Deployers”, said that it will often do important work, such as impact assessment or transparency notices or transparency notifications. Consumer lawyers said more rules needed and will be able to damage the confidentiality and security of users who hinder the ability of the states.
A moratorium on specific state rules and laws may result in the occurrence of more consumer protection issues by court or state lawyers. The existing laws around the AI unique unfair and deceptive practices will still be applied. “When the judges will tell you how to interpret these issues,” he said.
Susarla said the AI could be adjusted to more issues such as the spread of the spread in the industrial territory, technology, privacy and transparency. However, a moratorium in the AI regulation may cause such politics to the court. “This should be a kind of balance between ‘we do not want to stop updates’, but we must also recognize that there may be true results on the other.
ZWEifel-Keegan occurs in many politics around the management of EU systems, the so-called technology-agnostic rules and laws. “There is a potential to remember that there is a lot of existing laws and not to trigger a moratorium, but there is a potential to apply to AI systems as they apply to other systems.
The 10-year-old moratorium offered by the State EU law is now in the hands of the US Senate, where the Commerce, Science and Transport Committee has already heard in artificial intelligence.
Will AI Moratorium pass?
With the bill in the hands of the US Senate – and more aware of the proposal of the person – and more arguers in the moratorium. According to the proposal, the decision of the Senate MP, the Senate Parliamentarian, the proposals of the Budget Peace package were actually the rules of Bryrd, which must be engaged in the federal budget, announced a procedural barrier in the Senate. To accept the bead financing to get a moratorium tonator, it is likely to help me to help me.
The existing form is now asked that there is a question of less procedure than a political question. Senators of both parties, including the Republic Sensu. Josh Hawley and Marsha Blackburn expressed concern about closing the hands of the states.
“I think this is not taken as a procedure, and there is a strong question about it,” he said, “he said.
Any bill approved by the Senate will have to be adopted by the home, where the borders should be taken in the narrow way. Some household members who voted for the bill are also not loved by moratoriums, ie moratoriums, the main ally of President Donald Trumman Marjorie Taylor Greene. Republic of Georgia This week is placed in x The moratorium said he would not vote for the bill with the “blush” and moratorium.
At the state level a The letter signed by 40 state lawyers and signed by the General – He called on both sides – to reject the Congress moratorium and create a broader regulatory system instead. “This bill is accepted, or by changing the substituted laws, which is currently under consideration, they do not offer Americans to completely protect or add the potential damage to the AI,” he said.
