A Google Shareholder is Suing the Company Over the TikTok Ban

Tan, who personally supports the ban, believes that the tan believes that it is the implementation of the central issue. “There is a federal law saying that the Tiktok application is not in your store and I can see that the Tiktok is in the application store,” says Google. “Congress accepted the law and the Supreme Court held it in force. It is not controversial.”

According to him, Google openly ignores the law, and he wants to understand the legal basis for the decision, as well as the legal basis for shareholders to worry about the potential responsibility of Google. “I felt that I had to join some things that do something,” he said.

Books and notes

Tan, there is a history of use of the desires and claims of notes to explore and explore and fighting as injustices. In 2019 He brought about A new Hampshire hotel allegedly violated anti-discrimination laws from adults from adults under the age of 21. Tan says the job falls after the hotel’s policy.

This February, Tan, Attorney, called the Copies of the letters of the Pam Bondi, asked the US Justice Department with the request of public records reported to companies Google and Apple advise that strikes will not be liable to continue distributing. After claiming that there were no records in the office of Tan in the office of the Prosecutor General, he took the justice department to the court. (There are New York Times whole A similar claim.) In the trial, the Justice Department rejected mistakes.

In March, Tan, Tan, Tiktok ban associated with the ban associated with the alphabet, the Board of the alphabet, the letter forbidden by Actorney also asked. Tan demanded a law in Delaware, which allows the Alphabet in the “Good Fan”, which allows them to operate in a “good faith”, “Good faith”. It was learned that the alphabetical lawyers and his lawyers had relevant documents with a number of compositions, the company, the company’s relevant documents, but not to hand over it to do so by the court.

“The minutes of the board, the bony application is Google Play and if so, and how,

They assessed the risk of responsibility: “Tan on Tuesdays, Tan’s claim. “The minutes of the board also show whether Tiktok was exposed to the federal law through Google Play.”

Companies Disrupt the ban By continuing to distribute the application, it can face up to $ 5,000 for the user. Tan’s claim, Google claims that Trump’s decision and Bondi was not only liability to protect the thoughts of the TECH giant, not only to protect the legal risks.

Lawyer Gavril, with an exchange with an exchange with an exchange with an exchange, “Many planets claimed to be the reality of hypothetical damage to the hypothetical damage to the fact that the actual damage awaits you to explore how it will be.”