A New Law of Nature Attempts to Explain the Complexity of the Universe

Kauffman, the biological evolution is not always the types of new organisms, but also there is new opportunities for organisms, but there is no such thing as the evolution, but also cannot be available. He could not suddenly suddenly formed the soup of single-cell organisms that formed 3 billion years ago in the earth – this could not require all the previous, contingent, but special innovations.

However, there is no theoretical limit to the number of number of objects. This means that the appearance of new features in the evolution cannot be predicted, and some new features can dictate the rules of how the system develops later. “The biosphere creates its own capabilities,” Kauffman said. “We do not know what it will happen, we do not know what can happen.” Photosynthesis was so deep developed; Eukaryotes, nerve systems and language. As Microbiologist Carl Woese and Physic Nigel Goldenfeld 2011, we need a collection of additional guidelines explaining the evolution of the original rules – as in 2011. However, these upper rules must develop itself. So endless with an endless hierarchy. “

Physical Paul Devies of Arizona State University, “Biological evolution creates its own extensive area of ​​opportunities that are not valid or caught by any deterministic process of previous states. Thus, life is partly unknown.”

Mathematically, the “Phase Area” is the way to describe the possible configuration of a physical system, as is a relatively simple or atoms of a place like a idealized amulum. Davies and coworkers were recently proposed The evolution in the expandable accessible phase space can be officially equal “Imperfection theorems“Mathematician Kurt was developed by Kurt Gold. The Gold showed that any axiom system that could not show that any axiom system is true or false. We can accept such statements by adding new axioms.

As with Davies and colleagues, the Biological Evolution, the appearance of the biological evolution and all of them refusing to express it in the phase of themselves, the appearance of new actors to create new opportunities for movement. It does not refer to millions of stars, even in a galaxy, not even for physical systems.

“The increase in complexity is providing future potential to find newly strategies inoperable to simpler organisms,” said Plant Development Biologist and an incomplete document in Sydney University. With the connection between the biological evolution and the unusual calculation, Devies said, “The heart of life is so magical,” he said.

Biology is special, then, in a peculiar way, among the evolutionary processes in obtaining a unique result? Hazen thinks that once the components of the system once the components of the system can “experience and work in the heads” – “Technological applications are outside Darwinism.” If Watchmaker is not blind, it is not blind.

Back to the bench

Hazen and colleagues are provided with functional information if the evolution involved in any choice, increases the complexity – does it mean that life itself and maybe consciousness and higher intelligence? Some biologists would oppose what they think. The impressive evolutionist biologist Ernst Mayr believed that the appearance of the surface intelligence, as a person as a person was “completely incredible.” After all, he said, how did the intelligence in a level that caused cultures and civilizations, how did he only matched the tree during the life of the Darwinian evolution?

Mayr’s evolution, perhaps the whole game of complexity and intellectual, then the whole game area is completely converted. People have had a planetary advantage in so fast (for better or for worse) so that this will happen to the question that will happen.

Illustration: Irene Pérez for Quanta Magazine

What about the chances of such a jump in the first place? The new “Growing Functional Data Law” is correct, it is obliged to be more complicated with life, leap and bounds once available. Some are not forced to trust in a pretty incredible chance measure.

In addition, the sovereignty of complexity is that the appearance of the laws in nature is not in the nature of the laws in nature, which regulates the smallest component parts, and does not effectively seize what is happening in the next. Undoubtedly, this is already in biology: Galileo’s (appropral), the experience of two crowds from the bent tower of the Pisa has a predictor in the absence of toponball but not live birds.