Apple, the app must stop non-app sales commissions, the judge says

Apple Inc., a federal judge that requires the opening of the App Store to the Optional Options and purchases in Procurement in the Procurement Procurement, said in a blistered decision that sent a company for a possible criminal area.

US District Referee Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers was on WednesdayFortniteMaker Epic Games Inc. is due to the claim that the iPhone manufacturer, which is violating the law of California, which is violating the laws of California, could not result in an order in 2021.

Gonzalez Rogers also referred to the federal prosecutors to investigate the trial to judge the 2021.

The judge determined that Apple violated the “intentional” order.

“By maintaining the flow of design and effective income, it did it with the intention of creating a new antique and income barriers with a previously thoughtful flow; previously in his verdict,” he said. “He thinks that this court thinks he will endure such illogical.

Apple did not respond to a request immediately for comment.

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said in the post on a social media that the company will return to the company Fortnite The US App Store next week.

After a test in 2021, Gonzalez Rogers united with Apple with Apple, saying that the App Store policy did not violate the Federal Antitrest laws. However, the company allowed the development of an in-app payment tool to prevent up to 30% of the developers. The verdict was confirmed by the US Supreme Court.

Apple allowed users to complete the operations for the developers to complete operations for in-app purchases, but the required developers demanded that the company acquires 27%.

Gonzalez Rogers, Apple, in February and last year, approached the compatibility of Apple, and the lawyer approved the client’s confidentiality and asked the information that the information was the right protection.

Wednesday reigns, the judge said they tried to pay the apple inappropriation in Apple 2021.

“The truth was revealed after two bunches,” said Gonzalez Rogers. “Apple, despite his obligations, despite the goals of his order, only continued his antioxide behavior to protect his income flow.”

Judge, Alex Rome lied to the Witness stand of the financial president Alex Rome.

Case, US District Court, 20-CV-05640, US District Court, Northern Region of California (Oakland).

This story was first displayed Fortune.com

Source link