Australia’s submarine plans can sink?

The Australian Defense Minister woke up early this week – and the United States has been so far since the president has been elected as President in November.

The annexation of the Asia-Pacific will give more assistant nuclear submarine technology compared to police police, the United States, which brings together an overground area between British and Australia, in China under investigation

White House wanted to be sure on Thursday The so-called Aukus Pact “The President matched the first American agenda”.

This is the latest movement of a long-term friendship with Canberra, under it, the conflict can stand without Australia’s largest ally in the world.

“I do not think that we should feel that our Australian allies are fully committed to our safety at the moment,” Sam Roggeveen, the Australia’s Lowy Institute Meditation Center is headed by Sam Roggeveen.

The paper is a clear beneficiary worth £ 176 billion ($ 239 billion in $ 239 billion) in the paper.

The technology under the pact belongs to the United States and is available in the UK with its own nuclear subs. However, the three countries are designed and built will be a development.

For Australia, this represents a fundamental update to the military. The new underwater model allows the country to operate faster and faster than the existing diesel engine and allow long-range blows against enemies for the first time.

It is a great thing to share things described as “crown jewelry” and hand over engine plans for the UK.

However, the history of the Australian armament is important to protect peace in the Asia-Pacific region, which is far from themselves by Washington and Downing Street.

Experts say that this is the technology and its hardware to put in the right place.

However, when the Aukus agreement was signed in 2021, many different leaders in all three countries – in the United States, Joe Biden in the United States, Boris Johnson in the United Kingdom and Scott Morrison in the United Kingdom.

Today, when an insulated lens is considered through the Lens Trump, it uses the country to explore global relations, while others have less to get us from a pact.

Defense Secretary Elbridge Colby, a previous critic of Aukus Elbride, will agree on the White House.

Two of the criteria they quotes explain. One is a request to “take full steps to perform their parts to perform the collective defense for collective defense.” The other is a need to ensure that the US arms industry is initially implementing the country’s needs to be adequately.

Trump management said in the allies, including allies, including allies, including allies, including their weight loss.

In addition, America also said that he struggled to produce enough nuclear boats for its forces.

“Why do we give this crown jewelry when we need the most?” Last year, Colby himself said.

The Australian government, but presents a quiet front.

It is natural for a natural leadership for a new management for its re-evaluation of their predecessor.

“I am very sure that this will happen,” Defense Minister Richard Marles said in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) from the Pact.

But there is a little doubt that can be a little early panic in Canberra.

“I think it is inseparable from Aukus since the beginning … The feedback itself is not worried. This is not everything,” Auan Graham told the BBC.

There is no trust in America that there is an increasing concern in Australia.

“During the first months of this period, in the first months of this period, I do not have to complete the faithful American allies in this period,” said Roggeveen.

“Trump said, for example, because Ukraine is part of the great, beautiful ocean, it is mainly the problem of Europe., Of course, there is a great, beautiful ocean that separates America from Asia.”

Washington did not encourage the decision to punch large tariffs for Australian goods in early this year, and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said, “not a friend’s action,” he said.

In the Alukus’s study, so far left in a research in Aukus, probably meet with Trump on the edges of the G7 summit in Canada next week. This is still a hopeless conversation.

But several former prime ministers were in a hurry to give two cents.

Conservative leader Scott Morrison, who discussed the Aukus Pact in 2021, should not be associated with the proposal that the study could “not interpret” and meet the security needs of a country.

“The concept is … honestly,” he said.

Morrison has fallen sharply in favor of Aukus, Malcolm Durnbull said that Australia’s need to “wake” and other plans have realized that other plans are implementing other plans.

Meanwhile, Paul Keating, a more close-up relationship with China, a beautiful language, this “can be the moment of Washington,” he said.

“AUKUS will always be shown: a contract is in a hurry to be in a hurry, British Blesthard Boris Johnson and mixed President Joe Biden was written behind a envelope by Scott Morrison.”

The unity of the United States is resoluted to the Australian country in some quarters in some quarters that trust in the country.

For Australia’s investigation, the Greens, the third largest political party in the country, “We need independent defense and foreign policy, which does not require us to make our will and back wealth.”

The United States is transformed in a few weeks and recommends the pact.

At the end of the day, Australia helps Americans use a large cost of five nuclear boats with a large cost. The United States has a lot of time – only ten years – to sort and provide them on the supply problems.

“The United States) benefits from augmentary aspects of Aukus – all three sides begin to jointly raise joint vessels together with mutual defense technology and ecosystem,” Mr. Graham adds.

Nevertheless, there will be difficult to delete the concern to the investigation completely – and there is only inflammatory disagreement over AUKUS in Australia.

But there is an opportunity, there is a possibility, he does not want to rewrite the agreement.

“I can easily see a future that Virginia classes we did not receive,” Mr. Roggeveen refer to temporary submarines.

When new models are prepared and built and built, the other will leave Australia with the more obsolete fleet in the other two decades.

What is happening in the event that the United States completely abandon the Aukus Union?

In this junction, several people sound the alarm.

It is still important to keep a large landscape, for the United States, in the field of opposition to China and the effects of the Pacific Ocean.

Mr. Roggeveen did not pay for the potential confrontation in the Pacific Ocean, the United States did not invest.

“China has not changed mainly in the main structure of any country’s military power since the end of the Cold War and the US position in Asia.”

If you look at the separation of the United States, Aukus can be a very good awkward AUK – can it offer realistically realistically to continue the Kingdom of England?

And if everything falls apart and the Australian submarine stays without submarine, whom else can it turn?

France has given a number of previous, but Australia has options, but Australia has options, Mr. Roggeveen says: “It will not end the world to defend Australia.”

Australia is called “Mubarak geographically”, says and can draw strongly enough china without submarine with submarines, with “a reasonable defense budget and a good strategy”.

“Sometimes you have this expression that you have heard that the danger is above the door. Well, it is a great door to be true … Beijing is close to Berlin than Sydney.”

“In Australia has this mental block and at the same time in this emotional block – the fear of refusal, we will not be able to defend ourselves alone. But if we have compulsory, we are also possible.”