BBC Threatens to Sue Perplexity, Alleging ‘Verbatim’ Reproduction of Its Content

This BBC is threatening the AI ​​search engine with confusion For the unauthorized use of the content, the claim artificial intelligence The company creates BBC’s “Verbatim”.

As the General Director General of the Embarrant Aravind Srinivas published Financial times On Friday, the BBC claims that the standard AI model “BBC is trained using the contents”. The BBC said the BBC did not shape all BBC’s content, and “an offer for a proposal for a financial compensation offer” and presented a “offer for financial compensation”.

BBC refused to comment, but the report was reported to be accurate by the FT.

In a statement to the FT, confusion was the “manipulative and opportunist in the claims of the BBC and did not understand how the broadcasting giant technology, Internet or IP law. It was claimed that the confusion was alleged that the threat of the court “shows how much the BBC is ready to protect against Google’s illegal monopolists.”

The US judge ruled last year Google broke Antitrest law to strengthen search preferences.

Since then Perplexed is an online search engine installed on top of large language modelcan respond a lot to any question given. This means that it needs quality information to respond to users. The BBC has been confusing, the BBC creates answers built in content, which reduces readers to go directly to the BBC.

There is also concern that the AI ​​companies do not use journalism in the correct and impartiality. The BBC was the main issues of 17% of the main issues of 17% of the concept, and the “most common problems were in the actual inaccurate, source and missing context.”

Confusion did not meet immediate commentary.

This is the first time when the BBC is followed by an AI, PortlePlexes enters issues related to publishing houses. Currently includes places to give Sue or threatening to the Copyright Infault Wall Street Journal Together with the post of New York, Forbes and New York Times. Investigation by String Last year, found ways to walk around the blocks of confusion and break the content.

In the middle of these complaints, Confusing publishers launched an income sharing program Last year includes fortune, time, Texas Tribute and Der Spiegel.

Publishers are becoming a high degree of protection from their content, and EI companies with companies that see evaluations against the background of increasing narrow edges in the media. Openai, Creator ChatgptThere is currently $ 300 billion worth of estimates and Evaluation of confusion increased to $ 14 billion. Confusion Investors SoftBank, NVIDIA and Amazon and the Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos included. This is when journalism is fighting online The announcement dollar is adjected Google and focus transported attention Social media applications. Since 2005, 2,900 local newspapers were closed in the United States for a study Northwest University.

.