Best 8K TVs for 2025: Why We’re Not Recommending Any 8K TVs

A few years after major promises to the 8K TVs of the main television manufacturers, almost all of the previous years or 8K. In 2025 Only samsung He announced new models and all of them are very expensive. Therefore, we do not recommend 8k TV this year.

It would be easy to assume that it is the highest the-line TVs of the TV, based on its price and resolution, because it may seem strange. We do not recommend “best” TVs in our list The best TVs? The fact is that 8k TVs have been tested are well, and they are superior to models that reflect the technology that affects the quality of pictures Obeded and Mini-leaderwhen the screen is cheaper than inches.

8K’s failed promise

If we step back, it is not surprising to see how we came here. 8K TVs promised more detailed, acute images, but rarely they could really do good in this promise. Although many pixels are pixels as many pixels as 4K TV, 8K TVs were limited to the potential because it was very few 8k content. Without real 8k content, it is 4K content that you can show on these TVs. And while lifting up It’s been pretty goodIt’s not like this and no matter how detailed, do not look like a real 8k content.

This is undoubtedly the old chicken and egg scenario. Why do 8K TVs do when there is no 8K contents? Why can 8k content when there is no 8k TV? This was the same issue as 4k early and if we go back, despite the early HDTV. The last one was a strong impetus in the numerous industry to remove the old standard reciprocal television.

There was a similar impetus because it was allowed for larger screen sizes, and most importantly, most importantly, the most important thing can benefit from additional resolution. The reason for this is that most films and TV shows are historically caught on the film. It looks like you can get a rabbit hole and more detail and 4K than those possible without going to 35 mm, without speaking at all. This is a super broad statement, but the greater issue for our goals, the same, the same, not the same thing about 8K.

Of course, perhaps a few 35 mm negatively and most likely to look better in 8K in the 4K, but only part of the film and television shows. Many shows and movies now use at least 4K cameras, almost none do not use 8K. Even products that use more than 4K cameras rarely leave higher resolution content. Best case 4k.

Another issue, even if you have more, even where would you get the 8K contents? The main flow services are set for 4K and theoretically, you can offer 8k content on selected devices (again chicken and eggs). Cable and satellite often fight by offering 4k content in many areas. All I have to say, 8K TVs are racing cars without a way to move forward and driving weakness on the street.

Where do 8k TVs go?

Scott Ramirez has some ideas during a broader conversation with the Assistant President of the Development of the TCL product marketing and home theater, CNET:

“I don’t think 8K don’t think it will be very important in the near future. There are very few content for 8k. [for] Image quality contrast increases, coloring color, increases colorful gamut, brightness [and] the overall HDR effect. These things have more effect than 4k to 8k for the consumer. ”

Ondre Clarke, according to TV product marketing, according to Ondre Clarke, it receives more waiting and seeing approach:

“Hitrens saw great, high performance TVs, high performance TVs, performance growth and quality in this place, and today we are ready to bring 8K actively from 8K, to bring 8K to our lives when there is no time”

LG also sees the potential of 8k while confessing the reality. David Park, head of the head of the media solutions, list of customer value, told us:

“When buying 8k TV, there is an element of the future, but due to the lack of an 8k content, 8k adoption among consumers is extremely slow.

Numbers

What do we want to say “expensive”? Let’s take a look Samsung’s 2025compared with your own (excellent)) Qd Models, as well as some other options. The cheapest 8K model, $ 3,299 is a 65-inch QN900F with a retail price offered. OLED 65 inch S95D we described as it isThe quality of the comprehensive image we have ever tested“It’s $ 2,000. Magic sauce, especially in new models, it does not have AI sauce, as shown in new models, it will go for the 8K LCD to look better than qd-OLED.

But let’s say you want to go bigger. 77 inches S90D you are It is currently $ 2,100. 75 inch QN900F 8K? $ 4,299. Comparison is more than a higher 8k model, more thanks to the QN990F. Then 65 inches for 75-Incher and $ 5,499 for $ 6,499.

If you want to go indeed If you like great and, if you want to return to investment of all these pixels, there are 98-inch QN990F, which Blisters $ 39,999. Currently you can buy a It was 100 inch for 5% for that. Make sure you are sure, but because it is not really close to 8K, small pixels will be wasted.

Is the above comparisons, mainly because they are the models last year? Well, this is sold as written, so I claim it. In addition, if it is replaced by new models, it will still be cheaper than 8K TVs.

Looking forward

Does this mean that we will not recommend another 8K TV? We’ll see to hedge a little. The problems listed above have little to do with the ability to make any manufacturer’s product. We know that they can do 8k as they do. The problem with 8K is the lack of content. No company (good, other than Sony) can do about it. Without 8K content, as noted, 8K TV has very little sign.

If TVs were cheaper or cheaper than 4k counterparts would not be a big issue. They generally cost more expensive and just perform as good or better just like some contests. The resolution is not only one side of the image quality and it is not one of the most important, it makes it really an expensive feature that you can not really use.

Thus, we do not recommend any 8K TV for 2025. If the prices fall, 8K content is widely available or there is another number of other large and unexpected turns, maybe we will be in the future.