ChatGPT is referring to users by their names unprompted, and some find it ‘creepy’

Some ChatGpt users recently saw an incident recently: sometimes, chatbot applies to them with its reasons as a result of challenges. This was not previously standard behavior and claims that several users never called Chatgpt names.

Reviews are mixed. A user, software developer and ai enthusiast Simon Willioncalled the feature “creepy and unnecessary.” Another developer, Nick Dobos, gossip He “hated.” X is converted into a cursor search Cheap users Chatgpt’s first-name behavior with mixed and caution.

“This teacher continues to call my name, lol” wrote a user. “Yes, I don’t like it.”

Does your name look like your name in the thought chain, creepy and unnecessary? pic.twitter.com/lyrby6bk6j

– Simon Willison (@simonw) April 17, 2025

Accurate, when the change occurs or is not clear when related ChatGpt’s Improved “Memory” feature Allows Chatbot to take past conversations to personalize Hell. Some users in the X began to call Chatrpt, memory and related personalization parameters with disabled and related to the names.

Openai did not meet the demand for TechCrunch comment.

It feels weird to see your name in the model thoughts. Is there a reason to add that? Does Github make better or more mistakes as I do in the reposu. @Openai O4-Mini-High, does it really use in a special request? pic.twitter.com/j1vv7arbx4

– Debasish pattanayak (@Drdebmath) April 16, 2025

In any case, the blow, sounding Valley Openai, you can fight to overcome efforts to make more “personal” for people who use it. Last week, the company’s General Director Sam Altman pointed to the system of “recognizing the child’s child” to be “extremely useful and personalized.” However, according to this latest reaction of these recent reactions, everyone’s opinion was not sold.

One article A psychiatric office in Dubai can be published by the Valens Clinic, publishes a little light to visitor reactions for the use of ChatGPT. Names intimacy. But as a person or chatbot, the case – when using a name from a name, it encounters inacuthentism.

“When applying to them, it is a directly strongly irrelevant strategy using a person’s name,” Valens writes. “This indicates acceptance and admiration. However, the use of undesirable or extravagant can be considered fake and invasive.”

In a similar vascular, perhaps the fact that many people do not want to make a chatgpt – anthropomorphizen is an emotional aspect. In the same way, most people want to call their toasts with their names, do not want to “claim” that he understands the importance of a name.

This correspondent said that when he said he was investigating for Kyle in O3 early this week, this correspondent found this correspondent. (Changes changed on Friday turned back; O3 called me “user”.