Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
States will not be able to apply rules in artificial intelligence technology According to a plan considered in the US House of Representatives. This legislationin one adjustment This week, no state or political section, no government or political section, no government or political section will not regulate any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence. The proposal will still need to be confirmed before Congress and President Donald Trump.
AI developers and some deputies, federal actions, the United States, the United States, said the federal action should be necessary to ensure patchworking of various rules and regulations. Rapid growth in a generative AI since today Chatgpt In late 2022, it is exploded on stage and manages companies in accordance with the intended space as possible in technology. Economic influences are important to see which country of the United States and Chinese races preferred to the technology, but generating AI, other risks for consumers who create privacy, transparency and other risks.
“As a country as an industrial and one country, we need a clear federal standard,” We need Ai -ANDR Wang, the founder and CEO of Information Company EU April Hearing. “But we need us, we need a federal standard, and we preferred to prevent the result of this result.”
The efforts of states to limit the ability to regulate artificial intelligence can be said that more consumers protecting around a technology, which is increasingly undertaken to every aspect of American life. “There have been many discussions at the state level and I would think that this problem is important for us to approach this problem at a very level,” he said. “We could approach him at the national level. We can approach him at the state level. We need both.”
Several states have already begun to arrange AI
The proposed language would apply any regulation, including the bar states, including those in the books. Exceptions are rules and laws that facilitate the development of AI and the same standards that make it similar to unusual models and systems that do not do similar things. Such rules are already beginning to open. The greatest focus is not in the United States, not in Europe, which is already in the European Union Standards for AI. But the states begin to take action.
Colorado a set of Last year, consumer protection will come into force in 2026. California, received more than one thing about the EU Last year laws. Other states often have laws and rules engaged in special issues like depths like or require information about the training information of AI developers. At the local level, if used in the hiring of AI systems, some rules apply to potential employment discrimination.
“When they want to regulate the EU,” When the EU regulation comes to what they want to regulate, “It is a map” Arsen Kourinian, the law is partner in Mayer Brown. So far, the State MPs presented at least 2025 550 offers Around the AI, according to the national conference of state legislation. Last month, the meeting of the Home Secretary Committee, Republican Jay Obernolte from California, said he wanted to advance the government. “We have a limited number of legislative runways to solve this problem before the states are very close,” he said.
Although some states have laws on books, not all did not come into force or any execution was done. The potential of a moratorium limits its short-term effects, Cob’s Zweifel-Keegan, Managing Director Keegan for the Union of International Privacy Specialists in Washington. “There is no application yet.”
A moratorium will probably be able to avoid government legislators and politicians and to prepare new rules. “The federal government will become a key and potentially sole regulator around AI systems,” he said.
What does a moratorium mean in the State EU regulation
AI developers asked for any guards consistent and corrected in their work. During the Senate Trade Committee Hearing last weekOpenai CEO SAM Altman, Sen Altman, a Republican TED Cruz from Texas, an Ab-Sty regular regulation system said to be “catastrophic,” he said. Altman suggested that the industry has developed its standards.
A Democrat from Hawaii, a Democrat from Hawaii, if the industry is enough to regulate itself, he said he thinks that one guardians would be good. .
The concerns of companies – both the developers of AI systems and “locators”, which use them in interaction with both consumers, in most cases, the impact of the impact of the impact or transparency notices is caused by fear. Consumer lawyers said more rules needed and will be able to damage the confidentiality and security of users who hinder the ability of the states.
“EU is widely used to make decisions related to people’s lives without transparency, accountability or application,” Ben Winters, EU and Head of Ben Winters, EU and Head of the Privacy and Privacy and Privacy. “The 10-year break would be more discriminatory, more deception and less control – simply put, siding with technological companies with people they influenced.”
A moratorium on specific state rules and laws may result in the occurrence of more consumer protection issues by court or state lawyers. The existing laws around the AI unique unfair and deceptive practices will still be applied. “When the judges will tell you how to interpret these issues,” he said.
Susarla said that the AI can be broadly regulated by the spread of the spread of the industrial territory, such issues such as human confidentiality and transparency. However, a moratorium in the AI regulation may cause such politics to the court. “This should be a kind of balance between ‘we do not want to stop updates’, but we must also recognize that there may be true results on the other.
ZWEifel-Keegan occurs in many politics around the management of EU systems, the so-called technology-agnostic rules and laws. “There is a potential to remember that there is a lot of existing laws and not to trigger a moratorium, but there is a potential to apply to AI systems as they apply to other systems.
