Copyright Office Punts on AI and Fair Use, One of the Biggest Questions Surrounding Gen AI

If you do not have been clarified by the US Copyright Office of the United States in the US Copyright Office – whether AI companies Can use copyrighted materials under fair use or creators – may require a violation – prepare to be disappointed. Office is broadcast on Friday, and this is not the main Win Tech companies that are looking for some of the creative creatures.

The Copyright Office of the United States in 2023 is a number of reports, leadership for creators, CHATGPT, Gemini, Meta AI and Dall-e, fighting for countless legal and ethical issues. In previous reports, the Copyright Office decided that the Copyright could not be copyrighted by AI EU edited content may still be eligible. These reports are not a law, but the agency’s AI age provides us a picture of how copyright protection works.

Now the existing third report is not the final report; This is a “pre-preparation” version. In this regard, the analysis of the Copyright Office will not have any major changes in the results of the WebsiteTherefore, the leadership that will offer for future claims gives a good understanding.

This 108-page report The training of AI models is legally legible to ask for the exception of the Fair use, which will allow copyright owners to use copyright rights by copyrighted by copyright.

In short, the Copyright Office did not rule out the possibility of fair use for companies using copyrighted materials for AI education. However, there are several important things that will be a metaphorical holiday against the fair use of the report in detail. Thus, it is possible that an AI company used by copyrighted materials without copyright is possible to be a key to copyright infringement. It depends on the AI ​​model, how it is used and what it produces.

“The spectrum is used to have the use of the results of the results, use for non-profit research or analysis purposes,” it is said. “On the other hand, a copy of the copy of the copy of expressive works of expressive works to create unrestricted content in the market … is unlikely to be as fair use. However, many use, will fall together.”

The Copyright Office, which is part of the Congress Library, is the subject of existing political disputes. CBS News The head of the department known as the Copyright register, the head of the Shira Perlmutter, this former weekend was fired by President Donald Trump. It was a few days after this Trump firing Library of Carla Hayden Congress on Thursday. Hayden was the first woman and the first African American to catch the position.

Here, the Copyright Office needs to know what to know why it is fair to use and why AI and copyright.

Why is it important to use fair?

Technical companies push a lot for the exception of fair use. If such an exception is given, it does not matter to use and use copyrighted work in their training information. Potential copyright infringement, in the center of more than 30 claims, including the New York Times V. It is also in the center of more than 30 claims, including those who are noteworthy of Openai and Ortiz. .

The Copyright Management said that these cases should still continue in the judicial system: “In order to connect the legitimate factors of the courts,” in no way “, because there is no mechanical calculation or easy formula.”

Writers, actors and other creators were equally rigidly with the fair use. In an open letter More than 400 are signed by Hollywood’s largest celebrities, the Developers ask not to allow the department to be fair use of science and technology policy. They wrote: “[America’s] Success is directly due to our direct basic respect for copyrights that take a creative risk by the talented and diligent Americans of the IP and talented and hard working Americans and the territory of the territory. “

So far, we have several more answers from the first place. As Openai, the general questions about the copyright law of concrete companies will have to wait in court.

Management to decide on fair use

Fair use is part of the 1976 copyright act. The guarantee provides the right to use copyrighted cases such as education, reporting and parody of original authors. There are four main factors to think in a fair use: one, the purpose of use; two, the nature of the case; three, the amount used and reasonably; Four, affect the market. Copyright Office report analyzes all four factors in the context of AI education.

An important aspect, AI Chatbots and image generators are the transformative of the work they have created significantly different from the original training content. The report appears that AI conversation brands used for deep research are quite transformative. However, there can be no image generators performing in a very similar style or aesthetics.

The report would be evidence that the protected areas of protected works – such as imaging generators that refuse to create popular logos – AI companies trying not to break. Despite the investigation of this guardians of the office, this is constantly Openai’s Studio Ghbli Image Trend clearly demonstrated.

The report clearly explains the AI-formed content in the market and the fourth factor. The loss of sales allows you to reduce markets, losses, losses of licensing capabilities for high-rise business markets and licensing opportunities. However, it also remembers the potential to benefit from the development of MONE products.

A popular alternative to sue among the owners of licensing, publishers and content catalogs is emphasized as a possible way to prevent copyright concern. Including many publishers, including Financial times and Axel Springer brandsWith the AI ​​companies, high quality and a large number of deals with AI companies included in the content created by the human.

If licensing is the only way to obtain this information, this information will prioritize the smaller technological companies that can pay for boxing for smaller developers. The Copyright Department writes that these concerns should not affect fair use analysis and are best to be resolved as the Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrest laws and organizations carrying them.