Donald Trump’s offer of Kashmir mediation puts India in a tight place

For decades, there has been something that has a taboo in the Indian Foreign Ministry, this is a third party – especially in Kashmir, a long time with Pakistan.

Knowners, then they are not surprised that the US President Donald Trump, known for his unusual diplomacy, touched the raw nerve in Delhi.

After the four-tense transitional conflict of India and Pakistan, the United States was taken to social media to announce the broker “Full and immediate ceasefire” by the United States.

Later, in another post, he said, “I will work with you in a thousand years, a solution to Kashmir can be arrived.”

The Kashmir dispute is when India has gained independence from the British government and is distributed by Pakistan to 1947. Both neighbors claim the Kashmir region as a whole, but only partially managing it.

Several rounds of bilateral talks have been resoluted for decades. India is an integral part of Kashmir’s territory and treated any talks, especially third parties.

The latest ignition, India, terrorist infrastructure in India, terrorist terrorist’s terrorist infrastructure, last month after 26 terrorist infrastructure, which caused 26 people in India managed Kashmir, carried out air strikes.

India was rejected by Islamabad if Pakistan was in the event.

Trump’s intervention was threatened by spiral a clash fighting between two nuclear armed rivals.

The parties used warplanes, missiles and drones and said they were mainly targeted by their military equipment, mainly in the border areas.

US intermediaries, along with diplomatic rear parties, prevented a larger confusionPresident Trump put the offer in Delhi.

“Obviously, it was not welcome by the Indian side. These years have been these years for these years, this former Indian foreign secretary Shyam Saran is talking to the BBC.

On the other hand, Trump welcomed his comments.

“We are also ready to support President Trump’s Jammu and Kashmir dispute, South Asia and beyond serious effects for peace and security,” A According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs..

Delhi’s position in Kashmir was toughened, especially in 2019, especially in Kashmir, withdrawed the special status of Cammu and Kashmir in 2019.

President Trump’s latest comments said that many Indians seeing this as a tried to “internationalize the Kashmir dispute.

The main opposition Congress party asked the government and the explanation of a party on the “ceasefire from Washington DC”.

“We opened the doors of third-party mediation? We want to ask the Diplomatic channels between India and Pakistan,” said Congress party spokeswoman Jairam Ramesh.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s statement The two countries announced the ceasefire, “said they agreed to start negotiations in the neutral area. This caught the Indians in surprise.

Delhi refused to discuss talks with Islamabad, refused to accuse his neighbor supporting the terrorism on the border.

Historically, India opposed any third-party mediation that quotes the agreement signed in 1972 after the war between the two countries. According to the SIMA agreement signed by the country’s leaders, “they are determined to resolve the disagreements through bilateral negotiations.”

Indian officials also argue that although the concept of a civil government in Pakistan, the country’s powerful military forces have begun transactions. In 1999, he points to the Kargil war, another conflict between the two countries, a group of Pakistani supported servicemen will begin after working in Indo-managed Kashmir.

The conflict agreed to refrain from resolving the Prime Ministers of India and Pakistan through bilateral negotiations and interfering with the domestic issues.

The Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi did not officially respond to the President Trump’s mediation proposal.

However, Foreign Minister Syrahmanyam Jaishankar said: “India has taken a strong and reconciled position against terrorism in all forms and manifestations.”

India is soon seen as a sign that direct bilateral talks are not again.

The view from Pakistan is different.

“Pakistan has always asked for third party mediation in Kashmir,” Immersiah, Imamabad, the Executive Director of Research and Security Research Center in Islamabad, because there is no mutual trust between the two countries.

“Now a super power is ready to collapse. Pakistan will see it as a spiritual victory,” Mr. said.

As Syed Muhammad Ali, Pakistan Strategic Experts, because India’s attractive rejection to Pakistan is an important rejection of the step taken to prevent the international community to prevent future confrontation.

“Kashmir is one of the most critical issues for the international community. The latest fast escalation proves that the saber-thrush can be missed,” Mr. hand.

India’s imaginative diplomacy, especially in 2014, began in 2014, as an increased global economic power.

However, this will have to move a hard balance to overcome Trump’s progress.

In recent years, the United States has always kept India as a supports against a convincing Chinese. With India, USA, Australia and Japan, along with India and Japan, the main member of the four-section dialogue group that occurred against China’s expansion in the Indian-Pacific.

In recent decades, Washington sold modern transport planes, helicopters and other military equipment that wants to modernize 1.4 million strong military force in Russian weapons.

Previous American offices knew India’s sensitivity to Kashmir and remained far from intervening. But with Trump, there is a question mark that this position is still ongoing.

The United States is the largest trade partner of India with bilateral trade in 2024 (about £ 98 billion) in 2024. The Modi government is currently negotiating a trade deal with Washington to prevent tariffs.

Delhi will have to walk a beautiful line. The US mediator will be allocated to see the ceasefire or “concept” and goes out of the current military voltage. However, he also eats to have a convenient commercial relationship with the United States.

Any attempts to expand the talks – now a hungry water sharing agreement or controversial bilateral issues such as Kashmir’s condition, strong criticism of internal levels, a good knowledge of the trap.