Doug Schoen: Why Israel’s holidays in Iran can cause regime change as in Serbia

President Donald Trumps The key / critical Iranian nuclear sites are an emergency decision to attack, two questions: First, how will the Iranian population react? Second, will this damage or help the regime change chance?

Of course, we will not get answers to these questions immediately. But I think it is fair to say that there will be history in the past that is not so far away, it offers a teaching guide to what can be good.

Although this point is difficult to meet these questions with high levels, there is a historical analogy I mixed deeper, which can give concepts.

While Trump points in the change in regime in Iran, when they are “Great Ed” after the holidays

More than 24 years, while working while working Bill Clinton OfficeI was one of the main actors who advised the State Department about the situation in Serbia. There, I strived for the president to demonstrate to the Serbian opposition Slobodan Milosevic can be beaten.

At that time, many in the United States and Serbia, many NATO bombings and 1999 Kosovo War Milosevic have prepared a rally around the flag effect.

He also demonstrated the reflection of the surveys I carried out.

The data was extremely weak, despite the fact that the regime describes Milosevic as strong and popular, 70% unfavorable rating.

As it is recognizes In the post of Washington, the strategic leadership presented on the basis of surveys, caused several times a few times a thoughtful campaign.

Behold, a post-Ayatollah, a war with Israel, may seem like Iran

Milosevic has parallels between the collapse and condition Khamenei mode Today it finds itself.

In both, despite the incredibly appreciation of foreign airstrikes by the citizens of foreign airstrikes, there are those who feel that the popularity is felt in favor of a project forecast.

We later found that there was a wide rage against the government over the weak state of the economy, especially in Serbia. There is similar in Iran – unless it is more intensely – dissatisfaction with chronic bad mizandling of the regime chronic economic and national policy.

In order to make sure, the information inside Iran is limited, although it is released in the country, although a firm specializing in methodological sound surveys questionnaire This explains this in October last year.

From about 8 to 10 – 10 (78%) Iranians felt the government’s policy is guilty of the country’s economic struggles.

In addition, in 90 million countries, where coarse From 60% to 30 years of age, the same survey shows that Iranians believe that Iranian young people do not see prosperity in Iran. “

All this, like Milosevic mode, seems to be strong popular support of the Iranian government, but under the surface is extremely weak and sensitive.

Amission in the conflict of Israel in terms of the regime change in Iran

The idea that Israel and especially the Prime Minister for many Benjamin Netanyahu – It is difficult to be serious in Iran that can cause regime change.

However, more detailed examination of the current situation, as well as the concept of Iran in its historical history of Iran, it supports the concept of Netanyahu.

Historical review: Since 2009, millions of Iranians have had millions of conventional protests from the streets against the government.

Although this protests have a large number of reasons – until the latest demonstrations that are left with the killing of the obvious election fake Mahsa amine – All emphasize the widespread opposition to the current mode.

As I saw in the same vascular, as I saw in Serbia, a large number of protests and various reasons can be able to mobilize and pressure the regime effectively, which reveals significantly large opposition.

For this purpose, whereas we had to actively organize these actions SerbiaThese conditions are already clear in Iran and larger.

Netanyahu urges Iranian citizens to seize ‘opportunity’ for regime change

The laws of Iran looked at the youth, about 44 million women’s pressure laws, in 2022, in 2022, in the protests of the Mahsa, almost one half of citizens who had small amounts to lose death.

Emphasizing how deep in the regime of hate, Iran is international declare Buy letters expressing their individual thanks to Netanyahu and Jerusalem post declare “This war has intensified and revived new optimism,” but for this war for the change of Iranian regime.

The source of the post inside the Iran continued, “The conversations around the capital (Tehran) were directed to the last days of the regime and brought themselves.

An argument outside of Iran has already begun.

On one side, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as former National Security Adviser John Bolton, President of the Yorktown Institute Seth Cropsey.

Pentagon converts the deceit of the US Army and its strategic deception by the US Army’s surprise

These people argued – Netanyahu talking to Bolton and Wall Street Journal and Netanyahu Fox News’ Bret Vater In other forums – this is the most appropriate point to change the regime in Iran since the revolution in 1979.

Given the anti-reservoir against the regime between the Iranian people, the best course of action, the best course of action, the destruction of the Israeli regime’s military and government characters will have courage to unite against the government.

These are the President of the discussion as French President Emmanuel Macron. In a hasty regime change in Iraq and Libya, the macron is doubting the possibility of success, following the change of regime, lean “Will result in chaos.”

Some are also agreement Israel’s actions can cause a “rally around the flag” and a spark of nationalism between the Iranian people.

It is clear that both parties have legal evidence, are well-founded I have experience in SerbiaI believe that Netanyahu and those with him have a stronger case.

Click here for more Fox News Review

The Iranian government is weaker than the fact that Israel destroys almost the entire command chain and overdue the general control of Iranian skies.

In the same way, unlike Libya and Iraq, Iran has a large sense of national unity, but also a large opposition Faraway Or there was never Libya.

Together, there is a strong evidence of Israel’s congregation in the symbols of the regime, especially to prevent the Iranian regime in Iran.

Of course, there are risks in promoting the change in regime, and this is not guaranteed by the next regime. May result in a much more extreme government in which the rest of the rest Revolutionary protection hard liners.

But it is a mistake of similar magnitude to lose this chance. History showed that depressed people are angry with their governments, find confidence and support – even by air – the result should survive the chaos or the existing government.

Click here to get FOX News app

This may still be, the original regime may result in change.

In both cases of Iran and Serbia, the broadcast of the country and truly civilians were damaged by civilians. In the case of Serbia, all the net results have strengthened the decision to get rid of an authoritarian dictator – Milosevic of the Serbian people. In Iranian case, history will weaken a fragile regime if there is any guide, and I hope it will provide a speech for millions of Iranian Iranians who want more freedom and tranquility in their lives.

Click here to read more from Doug Schoen