Dyson Airwrap vs. Shark FlexFusion: I Tested Both Hair Tools on My Long, Thick, Wavy Hair. There Was an Unexpected Winner

Several high-tech hair tools were recorded in the way Dyson Airwrap came to high-tech hair tools. Smooth, well-made and yes, expensive. But in recent years, new, The more affordable bidder entered the center of attention: shark flexfusion. Both brands give salons and promises at home with less heat damage at home.

After testing both hairstyle tools in a few weeks, I saw similar results that each works best for different hair types. For the purpose of this article, I put my hair upside down and shared one half of the Dyson Airwrap and the other half shark with flexfusion. I wore the results all day, I tested the arrest and volume, and I noted how each side was held next morning.

How does this hair tools work

At first glance, Dyson Airwrap and shark flexfusion promises the same results. Both are dried, curled, volume and smoothing tools using fast air flow instead of extreme heat. Both styles and the effect of the Codada use a technique known as a technician, which is followed by a natural curve of a natural surface. Shake your hair without twisting parts or clamps around the barrel.

Dyson vs Shark: Comparison schedule

Feature	Dyson Airwrap	Shark flexfusion
Price	$ 599	$ 349
Includes additions	Scorpion	To 4
Heat settings	2 Heat Settings + Cool Shot	3 Heat settings + cool stroke
Technology	Coola effect	Coola effect
Cord	8.5 feet	8.0 ft
Hair types are supported	For the thicknesses of the thin, medium hair	Works well in all hair types including thick and curl

First Test: Make my hair with both vehicles

I tried a real side to compare them enough. I made my hair out of the middle and fixed one half with a smoothing brush of Dyson, with the other half the shark brush, both vehicles set with the highest heat setting.

Shark smoothed my roots in a better way than Dyson. It took my hair longer to fix my hair with Dyson because I had to transfer more near my skin and did not even adjust the volume. In the end, the shark also gave a smooth, polished result. I expected Dyson to do a better job, but the shark brush is designed to give you more blow look and the Dyson Smoothing Brush is more than for serious correcting. The shark definitely caught my thick waves and shape with better tension.

Although I have to pay attention to the noise level. Sharks are more silent than Dyson. Sometimes I felt the shark with the shark need to use headphones in style near my ears. The Dyson vehicle performed very silently.

Dyson side:

• The hairs in the smooth-making brush moves side by side by side, which is drawn on hair and breaking. These elegant moves have added my hair.
• He did not hold my hair tightly as I like, and left the waves that appear near the roots. If your roots are flat then this will not be a problem. But you may need a few transitions or rounded brushes to completely correct them with deep waves, curls or rolls.
• The ends were good but were not praised and praised.

Shark side:

• Fusion brush grabbed my hair better and gave more tension, giving the roots, a smooth look ends. Therefore, I had to transfer less and cut my drying time 10 minutes compared to Dyson.
• The flow of air felt stronger to contribute to dry faster.
• In general, the end result with sharks was like a professional blow.

Judgment: For this part of the test, the shark was a long, a clear winner for my thick hair. Half of the shark, the heat is harmless, as if I have professionally served) it looked better. However, if you have gentle hair with fewer tissues, Dyson must give you great results.

Second Test: Using curly sticks

I tried the twisted supplements of each vehicle after making both sides of my hair smoothing and corrected with fusion brushes. Dyson Airwrap I used the conical barrel from one hand – not the thicker which gives more kick appearance. It was a dried side with a smoothing brush. I dried with a fusion brush, I used the shark flexfusion curling bar. Both vehicles have dry or wet settings, so I used them in the highest parameter for dry hair.

Out of bed, Dyson wins brownie points for a single turning curly barring. Switching facilitates curl directions – just twist the upper part of the barrel. The old Hawaiian version required two separate barrels to curl in different directions.

Shark FlexFusion uses two separate curly sticks marked with arrows, each to show the direction of air flow. This makes Dyson more comfortable – just two sticks, you just need a barrel and get faster to use. You need to change the sticks to compile all sides of the head, and often you should wait for them to cool them first. I often found so hot to handle them.

Dyson side:

• This side of my hair was more solid, more determined curls
• It was easier to manage due to a single barrel key option
• Airflow and barrels, less boots and hugs, the lesser and the barrels felt very thin (average for the average hair)
• Curls were more constructed and classic, which is more suitable for official style or long abrasion
• Dyson can also decide if two curly barrel size, 1.2 inches and 1.6 inches, more stiff or discharges. My experience with a larger barrel is that it does not give a constantly twisted look, but rather than a wave of shock.

Shark side:

• More moving looser, bouncier gave curls
• The air stream felt stronger so I had to spend less of my hair twinkling my hair
• Sticks and airflow was a better grip in my hair (better for thick or textured hair)
• I find better for a random look that had a softer, more lived texture

Judgment: If you want accuracy and convenience or match the average hair, Dyson is the best choice. On the other hand, if you want to be comfortable curly and leash or leap or leash or textured hair, the shark is a better choice.

Dyson Airwrap vs Shark Flexfusion: Other attachments included

The most popular tools used for both sharks and dyson are curly and corrective supplements, but both brands offer additional additions to add versatility daily. Here’s a breakdown of the tools offered by each:

Dyson Airwrap attachments

• Conical Airwrap barrel (for hard curls)
• 1.6-inch air belt long barrel (for emptiver twists)
• Dryer and flyaway smooth
• Let’s drive
• Great, round volume brush
• Soft Smoothing Brush

Takeaway: Dyson gives more customization additives that provide accurate styles and polished results. The FlyAway connection really differs to polish cheat hair.

Sharks flexfusion attachments

Sharks are a structured bunch of flexfusion, with a fusion brush and a ceramic corrective (as a plain) and the choice of two additions. For me, I chose curling sticks and styles concentrates, so I can use it as a business drying machine in your hand. You can choose two of the following:

• 1.25 “Automatic dressing curls
• Oval brush
• Definitory curl
• Frizz Fighter Finishing Tool
• Extensive gear comb
• Style concentrator

Takeaway: Sharks prioritize efficiency because you can actually choose the means you will use. You will get the basics for your styling needs, so it’s less about endless combinations and practicality.

Which is the best: Dyson Airwrap or shark flexfusion?

As a man with a thick and textured-haired color, the majority of the most of the quality of hair care I know it is built with thin hair. I think these tools can both work with all kinds of hair, for some warnings.

Dyson feels airwrap and more rewards appear, but you need to make more small hair pieces section and styles and get polished results (and more time). For fine hair, you probably can get away from bigger parts.

The shark is diligently manages the volume and gives a smooth look to my roots and ends. I think the highest parameter can be very strong for fine hair so it is so good to use a softer parameter to avoid breaking.

Dyson Airwrap Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Feeling luxurious and design
• Great for tighter curls and soft blows
• Low heat that makes it safer for daily use

Cons:

• Fight with thick or curly roots
• Costly
• Requires more time for tight hair

Sharks and disadvantages

Pros:

• Better tension and grip for thick, wavy or curly hair
• Smooth results for roots and ends
• Faster style
• More favorable

Cons:

• Curling sticks require you to change them for different air flow directions
• Higher air flow than Dyson

The final judgment

If you have a long, thick, twisted or wavy hair like me, the shark can be the best choice for you flexfusion. Gives faster results, smoothes both stages and smoothes more efficiently and is for part of the Dyson Airwrap price.

He said that Dyson is a leader for a good reason in the world of hair care. If you like more polished curls, if you like a luxury experience, Dyson is a fan of Dyson or a medium-haired fan, it is absolutely worth the collapse.

If we look objectively in the single performance, a tool that will work well in all hair types, the shark flexfusion is really impressive.