Elon Musk’s ‘truth-seeking’ Grok AI peddles conspiracy theories about Jewish control of media


Want smarter ideas in your inbox? Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get what is important for businesses, information and security leaders. Subscribe now

Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company Xai After that, he faces updated criticism Thoroughly July 4, the holiday weekend, including questions, including questions, and answered questions and answered questions, and answered questions from the Jewish control of Hollywood.

Events come to start to start Pre-starting Xai’s expected Grock 4 modelsThe company has a task of an opponent’s task in the leading AI systems from Anthropic and Openai. However, recent disputes arise in EU systems, security and transparency and transparency – enterprise technology leaders should consider carefully when choosing AI models.

X (Earlier Twitter), a particularly strange stock exchange, GROK, Jeffrey Epstein’s connections, almost answered a question as the Muskan himself. “Yes, there is limited evidence: In the early 2010, the old wife (~ 30 minutes) once (~ 30 minutes), inappropriate and rejected island,” said Bot, then “expressive mistake” before acknowledging the answer.

The incident asked AI researcher Ryan Moulton Assuming that Musk is trying to do “the answer” by the desire of Elon Musk “by adding the” answer “”. “

Perhaps more concerns answered questions about Hollywood and Politics, which is described as a “significant improvement” on July 4. When asked about Jewish influence in HollywoodGroK said that “Jewish leaders are historically dominated by leadership in major studios, and again Warner Bros., Paramount and Disney,” Add “critics are more important than this extremely developed ideologies.”

Chatbot also claimed that the concept of “Environment, Propaganda and Provocative Tropics” in Hollywood “Anti-white stereotypes“And” Mandatory Diversity “may disrupt the practice that follows the film for some people.

These answers noted that GroK’s previous, more measured expressions in such issues. Just last month, Chatbot noted that although Jewish leaders are important in Hollywood history, the allegations of “Jewish control” are related to anti-Semit’s myths and exceeded complex property structures. “

AI mishaps reveals deeper systemic problems

It first created problematic content to fight. In May, Chatbot helped to write references “White genocide“In South Africa, Khai has answered answers on those who are not completely related to the accused”Unauthorized modification“His back systems.

Repetitive issues emphasize a fundamental problem in the development of AI: the biases of the creative and training information inevitably affect model performances. Like Ethan MollickA professor at the EU, in the Wharton School, X.: “Taking into account many issues with the proposal, I really want to see the current version for grock 3 (x answer) and GROK 4.”

In response to Mollick’s statement, Diego PasiniIt announced that the company, which appears to be a Khai employee Showed the system in GithubExpressing: “Today we pushed the desire of the system earlier. Feel free to take a look!”

This Published Tips GROK’nın “Direct boot and elon’s public reports and guidelines and originality to express their disclosure and authenticity, and why the bot will be able to explain why the muskan responded as himself.

Enterprise leaders face critical decisions on AI security concerns

Evaluating AI models for enterprise placement serves as a fairy tale for technology decision-making, GROK issues, AI system systems warning the importance of a comprehensive vetter for security and reliability.

GROK-related problems emphasize the main truth about the AI ​​development: these systems inevitably reflect the biases of people who build them. Musk promised to be Xai “The best source of truth remotely“He may not understand how his world will form the product.

The result is similar to the objective fact, and more is similar to social media algorithms that strengthen the division content based on the developers of the creators that users want to see.

Events also collect questions about management and testing procedures in Xai. Although all the AI ​​models are taken to some extent, the frequency and severity of Groc’s problem exits and the severity of the company offers potential gaps in the security and quality of quality.

AI researcher and criticism, AI researcher and criticism, an Odellian dystopia, the billionaire re-use GROK to re-use the groc and revised the recycled database. “Since 1984. You couldn’t get a groc to align with your own personal beliefs, so you are preparing to rewrite the date to match your opinion” Marcus wrote in x.

Basic technological companies offer more stable alternatives such as trust

The enterprise increasingly becomes increasingly in terms of critical business functions, confidence and security. Anthropical Claud and Openai ChatgptAlthough not without their limits, it is generally a more consistent behavior and stronger security measures that create harmful content.

The time of these issues is especially problematic for Xai because he is about to start launching Grok 4. Benchmark tests leaking with the holiday weekend, may not be able to compete with frontage models in terms of really raw models, but can not be enough to trust the system for reliable and ethical behavior.

The lesson for technology leaders is clear AI, AI enterprise operations, biased or invalid model placement – both risk of work and potential losses continue.

Xai did not immediately respond to commentary requirements for recent events or comments to resolve concerns about the behavior of grock.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending now

Former Russian minister found dead hours after fire in the open suicide – National
Vergil Ortiz Jr., Israel comes to riyada ready to clash with Madrimov
Shakur Stevenson, which requires gratitude and humility from Floyd Schofield
BeterbIeye-Bivol 2 in Benavidz: A prelude for a mega battle?