ENG vs Ind: Don’t disappear akash deep delivery Joe’s root? Here’s a comment



This The second test match between England and India In Edgbaston, the riveting competition, which demonstrated the exceptional cricket talent on both sides. However, in the spotlight, unexpectedly changed from the movement in the field, to a single, controversial delivery from India’s Fast Bowler, Akash deepFrom the sake of the star corpse of England, Joe’s rootFor a six run on the 4th day. This special ball has become the epicenter of a heated dispute, has increased questions about its legitimacy and the questions of the cricket-free routine.

Akash cleanses the deep yoe root

The incident was prevented from the 4th to the 4th of England, which encounters 408 escape target. India attacked a ball, a ball, a ball, a ball, a ball, a ball, tore the root of a clean bent, bowled, bowling with deep, pace and accuracy for improvements. The dismissal was first greeted as the main moment for India, potentially waved the mastery in his favor. However, the celebrations quickly shadowed quickly and fans began to investigate the legitimacy of delivery. Alison Mitchell In a special one of the BBC test match, the Akash depths appeared beyond the return of the back leg, Akash Depık’s back leg turned out to be a potential violation.

No-ball of the front foot, most cricket lovers, rear foot bodies, although equally important, often get less attention. Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) Cricket laws clearly defines the settings for a legal delivery, including special conditions for the back leg.

According to the law 21.5.1: “Bowler’s rear foot did not cause the return to turn back during the delivery step.” This means that during delivery, any part of the Earth shall be in the writer of returning the location during the birth.

On the contrary, the law applies to the fore of 21.5.2: “Front leg should be grounded with part of the foot with a part of the foot, as well as the same side of the large-grown-up of the magnitude, the same side of the middle stumps behind the turning and opening.”

The illegal, Bowler’s back leg beyond the return bronze, delivery is automatically illegally illegally and should be called no balls, regardless of the position of the front foot.

Read: ENG vs Ind 2025, 2nd test – daytime weather forecast and rain forecast 5

Control over the area: a missed call?

Akash clearly showed the widespread repetition of replawgings to the root of the skin. Visual evidence has put up about two inches from the turn of the back leg. Despite the visible violation, the umpires in the field did not call any ball. In addition, the third UMPire, which usually uses technology to inspect the front-legged balls, did not intervene. Unlike technological accuracy applied to the front foot inspections, unlike rear foot violations, this relying on the naked eye is the main point of the dispute in such incidents.

Former cricketers and respected commentators, including Ravi Shastris and Stuart wideHe engaged in a live discussion in connection with the incident. Despite their interpretation, the foot is really on the line, the ball is released in the exact moment. They claimed that “Hovering” Delivery has made legal. However, the harsh words of the law indicate where the leg is “Lands” where not “Hovers” To create uncertainty that burns the ongoing dispute.

Read: Eng – Morne Morkel violates the silence on the decision of the late Declaration on the 4th day of the EDGbaston test against England





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *