Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Apple’s Appic Games in the Apple Antitrest case in Apple Antitrest case determined that Apple killed the court’s decision in the Apple Antitrest case.
Tim Sweeney, Epic Games’ CEO, “There is no payment in web operations. The game is over for Apple tax.”
If Sweeney is correct in the statement of the verdict, Fortnite, this can be a profitable result for epic games forbidden by apples in the United States, mainly due to the judiciary.
In the statement, a spokesman for Apple said: “We are determined by the decision. We will follow the court’s order and apply.”
He said, “Apple’s Junk Rights from 15% to 30% are like Dead here as in Europe in the United States in Europe. It is illegal, illegally illegal.”
Judge of the US District Court Yvonne Gonzales Rogers, made apples deprived of the court before the court. He, “For the reasons shown here, the Court finds Apple for deliberate violation of this court
2021 The order provided to limit and prohibit Apple’s antiquetic behavior
Antique price. Apple’s attempts to interfere in competition will not continue
Tolerated. “
Sweeney said the work lasted four years, four months and 17 days.
“We will return to the US iOS App Store next week,” said Sweeney. “Epic Peace proposal: Apple is expanding the friction of the court, the app store is returning to Bortnite in the app store and the current and future court session.”
We wanted a comment from Apple. Gonzales Rogers wrote in the ruler. Hearing). Apple has not been prepared for trial, but the court ordered the production of real-time documents, and as a result, the second hearings were conducted in 2025. “
To summarize: “One is not related to the cost of the intellectual property of 30% of the court” 30% of the court, “Apple has not responded to anything, and thus did not respond to anything.
He added that “Apple’s goal: Continuation of anticpetic income flow. Two, the court prohibited the ability to communicate with Apple developers and directly to consumers
Purchase mechanisms. Apple’s response: apply new obstacles and new requirements to enhance
Increase friction and complete page “fear” screens, static URL and breaking rates with a general page
expressions. Apple’s goal: to accept alternative purchase capabilities and customer use
to protect antiqueotic income flow. In the end, Apple tried to make an income
Billions of billions of valuable flow in the direct disobedience of this court. “
The judge said that “Apple is interested in the initial statements of the Court,” the documents showed that Apple chooses the most antique and antique options.
“To hide the truth, Assistant President, Alex Roman, explicitly lied,” he said. “Millip Schiller, that Apple is instructions for the instruction, but instead of the General Finance Manager, Instead, relates to the northern region of the criminal, instead of this in detail, to respond to the northern region of the criminal.
In 2021, in favor of the judge in most antitrust issues, Apple said that they could not advertise in the lower applicants in the lowest application of Apple’s 30% of Apple. The judge went to the US Supreme Court, which violated Apple’s antitrust laws, and applied to Apple and Epic’s resolution and the solution of Apple and epic. The court said that the judge of the judge was correct and the epics handed over to a great defeat.
But today a word is not talking. A new commission will collect or apply in app-app purchases. “
This will not be punished for exceeding the 30% of the following, these developers will be able to follow the epic games of many game developers and their own web shops or Apple’s store.
Source link
