Eric and Lyle Menendez’s recommended hearings can continue, the referee says

[ad_1]

Eric and Lyle Menendez’s hearings re-sentenced, in the Los Angeles County district, despite the opposition in the town of Los Angeles, ruled on Friday.

The brothers were sentenced to 18 and 21 years old, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in 18 and 21 years after being killed in Beverli Hills houses.

Former Los Angeles District Lawyer George Gascón He asked a judge last year To change the sentences of the brothers without the probability of sharing with their 50 years of life. This will be deserted to be punished immediately, because when the crimes were smaller than 26 years old.

However, Gascón’s successor revered the course. Nathan Hochman presented a petition to undo the request to judge again last month.

Hochman’s office did not allow the brothers to re-dominate, and talk about, to recognize, recognize, recognize, recognize, recognize, acknowledge and accept.

The Los Angeles County Superior Court said that the judge Michael Jesic, the prosecutors could make this dispute during the hearing.

“Everything you argue today is a completely fair game to judge again next Thursday,” he said.

Brothers have no statements

The brothers appeared in court to grow, but did not comment.

“They waited for a long time to get justice, and maybe, perhaps the greatest day since his lawyer Geragos’s lawyer.

Geragos, a lawyer for Eric and Lyle Menendez, went to the court building in Los Angeles.
Lawyer Mark Geragos comes to a court hearing for the court hearing on the claim of Customers in Los Angeles on Friday, on Friday, Los Angeles. (Damian Dovarganes / Associated Press)

Defense defended his self-defense work after the preliminary abuse after his father’s sexual abuse.

Habib Balian MP Habib Balian, Gascón’s main issue in the application of decision-making was not fully applied to the rehabilitation of the original crime and did not make the original crime.

“What does this mean? You really realized that you are wrong with your mistakes,” Balian said.

He presented evidence and video clips of the statements of the brothers, which consisted of the first test to demonstrate the events in “deceit, false and deception, lies and deception.”

When he killed his parents from the greed, he said they said they wanted the notes of a psychiatrist, “this is not self-defense.”

Geragos called the presentation of the “Dog and Pony show”, and this was “something other than a political coverage”, as a result of Hoccón, who defeated Hoccón in the district lawyer.

“They allowed sexual exploitation to be rejected,” he said.

Defense critiques the use of photo

Geragos claimed that the judge had a complete authority to rule in 2023 under a California law, which continued to be convicted of a California law, which allows you to remember a judgment in 2023.

Geragos also said that the late and bloody menendez, including a photo of parents of the parents of menendez, said the family members and victims.

Anamaria Baralt and Aunt Terry Baralt was among the family members in the courtroom. The family’s relationship with Hochman was acidified.

Most of the brothers support the renames of a long family. Tamara Goodall, a cousin, Hochman wanted this dismissal, claimed that he was allegedly biased against the brothers and violated the law to protect the rights of victims.

Meetings with the Hochman family had “enemies, rejected and a foster tone” and created a “intimidating and offensive atmosphere.”

In his action to withdraw the reaction of the district lawyer again, lawyers for the menendez’s brothers asked Hochman to do so, or asked that he was affected by “political winds’.

Without reconstruction, the brothers will still have another two ways to freedom. Pardoned Gavin Newsom to the California Govin Newsom, Gavin forgave Gavin Newsom, who investigated the people’s risk if the brothers will be released. The last listening of the Parole Council is scheduled for June 13.

The brothers presented an application for Habeas Corpus in May 2023, and asked the court to be a new court in the light of a new evidence. Hochman’s office also presented an action against the application.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *