Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Before a May, in accordance with the provisions of the provisions to lead the providers for the providers by the General AI (GPA) I have an act big ai, a Third draft The Practice Code was published on Tuesday. Formed since the code last yearAnd before the end of the project in the coming months, the project is expected to be rejected before the end.
One Website The code began in order to increase the accessibility of the code. The written opinion on the latest project should be submitted until March 30, 2025.
A risk-based rule of block for the AI is the only subtraction of combined liabilities that cover only the strongest AI model manufacturers – transparency, copyright and risk reduction. Code GPAI is aimed at helping model manufacturers to meet the legal liabilities and avoid the risk of sanctions for inconsistencies. The AI ACT Act, in violations of GPAI requirements, can especially reach up to 3% of the global annual turnover.
Miserable
The latest application of the code is calculated as “elegant obligations and measures” compared to the “elegant liabilities and measures” compared to the second draft opinion published in December.
Additional opinions, working group discussions and seminars will be fed to the process of turning the third project to the final leadership. Experts say they hope to achieve more “clarity and compatibility” in the last adopted version of the code.
It is divided into a handful of section covering the obligations for GPAIS along with detailed leadership for draft, transparency and copyright. There is also a section on the most powerful models (with the so-called systemic risk or GPAISR), security and safety liabilities.
Transparency includes an example in the form of management model documentation, GPAIS will be filled to ensure that their technologies are included in the basic information to suit their own.
In another place, the copyright section remains the most immediate controversial area for the great AI.
The existing draft, as “best efforts”, “reasonable measures” and “acceptable measures” and “acceptable measures”, or “acceptable measures” are assessed as “acceptable measures” and “appropriate measures” and “appropriate measures”.
The use of such mediators, information and cultural AI giants can feel the many walking rooms to catch protected information to bring up their models and Wish forgiveness later – However, it remains to be seen in the last project of the code.
The language used in a previous iteration is used – GPAIs must provide a point of a single connection and complaints to facilitate the convey of “direct and speed” complaints to the right fashion. Now there is just a line: “Signed will set a contact point to communicate with the affected right fashion and will provide information that can be easily obtained.”
The existing text shows that GPAIS can reject the “clear or extreme, especially repetitive or excessive, especially, especially in extreme, excessive, and use AI tools to turn on the scales and against Big AI For automation of complaints … simply ignored.
As for security and security, the requirements for evaluating and reducing systemic risks of EU EU ACT only to the lower part of the most powerful models (used) Total computing capacity of 10 ^ 25) – However, this latest project takes some further narrowing measures in response to the opinions of some pre-projects.
Pressure to the United States
Not found in the EU Press release The latest project is generally attacked on European legislation and the accounting of the bloc Specifically rules for the AIPresident Donald Trump is leaving the US management.
Paris AI at the peak of action last monthUS Vice President JD Vance has rejected the need to be regulated to ensure the application of the EU – will be based on the “AI opportunity” instead of Trump’s leadership. He warned Europe could kill the overgoing gold gas.
Since then, the block moved to kill an AI security initiative – put AI Liability instruction in Chopping Block. EU MPs also focused on the “Omnibus” package, listed in reducing red ribbons and bureaucracy, focusing on the reduction of red ribbon and bureaucracy. However, as long as the AI Act, open pressure applies to dilute the requirements.
In the trading show in the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona this month agoFrench GPAI Model Maker Mistral – Ai ai acti’s female actub During the talks to close the legislation in 2023, the founder claimed that the founder had difficulty finding technological solutions in accordance with some rules. Added that the company “to make sure that it works with these regulators.”
Although the GPAI code is compiled by independent experts, the European Commission is a “clarifying” guide, which controls other activities related to the law through the AI office and how it applies to law. Including definitions for GPAis and their tasks.
Thus, the AI office, “Time”, more forward from the AI office – the commission says the “rules will clarify” because it can offer a way to nerve-losing MPs for Deregulating.
