Explained the Land Law of South Africa – and why so much Donald Trump

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa is in the center of political odeestorm after confirming a law owned by private lands without compensating the lands belonging to the land.

The law, which is still being implemented, has taken the pus of US President Donald Trump, who saw him as an discrimination against white farmers.

Central-right political parties in South Africa and lobby groups opposed it, as the main reason to the confiscation of the confiscation, as the main reason is the main reason.

The Ramaphosa government provides compensation to be paid in the vast majority of the law and changes to increase the black ownership of the lands.

The majority of the private sown area still belongs to white people.

When Nelson Mandela reached more than 30 years, when he graduated from Apartheid’s racist system, this will be corrected through a desperate land reform and it is proven to be very slow and very expensive.

In rare cases, “Public interest” would be the necessary land, “public interest”, the BBC told law experts.

According to the South African law firm, the lawyers of Werksmans suggested that this will happen only in connection with the land reform program.

Although it can be used to access natural resources such as minerals and water, the company was added, In an opinion written by experts in the field, Bulelwa Mabasa and Thomas Karberg.

According to Mabasa and Karberg, according to their views, the productive agricultural areas will not be confiscated without compensation, he said.

Any confiscation can occur in just a few positions without a compensation known as EVC:

• For example, a owner did not use the land and held it for “speculative purposes”
• Or the owner, “he left the land with the fact that he could not control it, although he could not do it.”

The owners will probably still receive compensation for buildings and natural resources in the soil.

Mabasa and Karberg added that EWC “was not directed to rural lands or planting areas and can enter land in urban areas.”

However, in cases where compensation is paid, the rules can be changed, the owners are likely to make less money.

For the “fair and fair” compensation for planners, Mabasa and Karberg said to leave the market value.

Although the government was “prices” in 1994 after the rule of white and minority, the government has paid compensation for market value, despite the market value.

Lawyers said that there are “extensive procedural justice requirements, including the right to go to court if all Muslims are not happy.

The market value will be applied to the territory for the territory for a “public goal” for a “public goal” for the “public goal”.

This is probably not the main point of major disputes because A “challenging novel” – a point made by YuristNewsA legal website managed by law students from all over the world.

“The United States Constitution, for example, ensures that the government may have special property for the public so long for the ‘fair compensation’,” he said.

The government is hoping.

Western Cape Land Specialist Prof Ruth Hall University told the BBC that more than 80,000 areas were not resolved.

In the eastern regions of South Africa, many black people work free in farmers – this is allowed to live there in exchange and maintaining the lands of the owners of their cattle.

The government wants to transfer the property of this country to employees, and this was “unfair” and wanted to wait to pay the market value.

In the last three decades, the government used the existing powers for the property containing existing powers – market value is less than 20 jobs than compensation, he said.

The new law focused on black people who did not have the “Order” or “president” or “long-term renters”, which were not forced to be “in the period of war” during the white minorities.

“This is a bargaining chip.”

However, he doubts that the government has started in advance by implementing the law in the near future, because the “political maya value” was very high.

Academician, Trump’nın apologies to white farmers and said that the lands were seized and their lands were seized, “he said, he rejected the government.

In February, Trump cut off South Africa and announced the 30% tariff for South Africa goods and agricultural products in April, although this was 90 days.

It was followed by a demonstration of a neglected office of last month, Trump, White people were put on ambush ambush with video and printing of the alleged stories.

Trump, Ramaphosa’s coalition government, democratic alliance (also), as Trump against the legislation.

A statement on May 26, the party rejected the concept of the highest leadership body “Nile Compensation”.

However, it was agreed with the concept of fair and evenly compensation than market value compensation, “the legal court must be accepted.”

Surprisingly that Jaco Kleinhans, a reputable Africaner group of the Solidarity Movement, said that the new law could “destroy” some enterprises and opposed it.

“I don’t see the words of this text that this will happen” He was discussed at an agricultural exhibition in a recent panel A large number of conservative African farmers live in the Free State State Region of South Africa.

The South African Property Owners’ Association said that the owner of land for speculative purposes is “Irrasion” to give “Nile Compensation”.

“There are many landowners aimed at the only business. They do not release the land and have important costs,” the laws said the law would be tested in the courts.

Mabasa and Karberg, a landscape, the concept of AWC is “an internal absurdity in the legal definition of legal definitions”, he said.

However, lawyers said the alternative landscape is “in some cases that in some cases it will be fair and fair to be nil.”

South African Ministry of Public Affairs Dean Macpherson defended his legislation, along with his party, and.

In fact, it was responsible for the new legalization and discussion panel, although he had some concerns about the law, it was a “dramatic development” with the act of more protection for landowners.

According to him, the law may also help to end the deliberately required requirements against the state, and in some cases “Nile Compensation” may be right.

He gave the Eskom as an example of problems facing the State Power Program.

About 4,500 km (28,000 miles) plan to increase the supply of electricity to increase electricity to increase electricity supply to the end of the country’s energy crisis.

Ahead of the speech, some individuals said that 1 m Rand ($ 56,000; £ 41,000) with Eskom officials, he said.

“Is it just and fair to give them what they want? I don’t think it is in the interest of a wider society or state,” said Macfherson.

To give another example, Macpherson said that some cities in some cities of South Africa are in a “catastrophic” situation. After the owners leave, the buildings were “overducted” and “abducted” for “excessive runs” and illegal occupation. The value of the state to reset them can pay their value, in which case the courts can manage a worthy owner for “Nile Compensation”.

“Nile is a form of compensation,” Macpherson added while dominating farms.

Johannesburg Major Dada Morero told the newspaper in South Africa’s Postal and Guardian The housing waiting list wanted to use buildings for “Public Good” as the location of about 300,000 people.

He added that the owners of about 100 buildings could not be located.

“They left the buildings,” he said, and some of the owners were from England and Germany.

However, Mabasa and Karberg told the BBC that compensation for buildings should still be compensated for buildings, although such cases.

If they could not find state owners, they said, if they returned, or if they were followed, they said, “he said,” he said. “

The law, like Ramaphosa, Ramaphosa – only four months later – did not set a date for its fulfillment.

Soon, in any time, it is likely to do so because South Africa has tried to discuss trade agreement with the United States.

The internal front is also the headline of the opposition to the law. When we want this “Court Review”, he also progressed with a lawsuit to protest the Constitution of the Law.

The hard line of the DA, a few weeks ago, warned that the law was completely struck, “I do not know what to come.

“You have to be careful about what you want in politics and sometimes because you can get it often,” he said.

His opinions are in the deep parts of South African politics, such as deep parts of some parties, such as Julius Malema’s economic freedom fighters (EF), the legislation did not go enough to racial inequality in the land.

The soil does not have an easy solution to the dispute with such an emotional issue – and within the South African, as well as the US president, is likely to cause tension.