Famed AI researcher launches controversial startup to replace all human workers everywhere

Every time and then start with a mission explained by an “absurdly”, which is difficult to discover if the startup is a silicone gorge start, real or simply satira.

This is the case Mechanizea start of the founder – and a non-profit AI research organization imagined in X after announcement.

Complaints are sultia the prestige of both the initial mission and a respected research institution. (Even a director at the Research Institute stationed In X, “I want to go to my day: a comps crisis.”)

Mechanized was put into operation through a Thursday X in x Popular AI researcher by the founder by Tamay Besiroglu. The purpose of the beginning, Besiroglu wrote, “Full automation of all works” and “Full automation of the economy”.

This mechanization works to replace each human worker with AI Agent Bot? Essentially, yes. The beginning wants to provide information, evaluations and digital environments to ensure the automation of any business employee.

Besiroglu, even the entire mechanism of all mechanism is currently currently being charged in the market calculated in the market calculated in a total of salary. “The market potential here, the employees in the United States are $ 18 trillion in $ 18 trillion.

Besiroglu clarified the technology of “immediate attention to our attention” than the handicrafts that require robotics.

The initial response was often cruel. As a user of x Anthony Aguirre He replied, “Huge respect for the founders” This is sad to see it. Most of the most human labor automation, most of the largest companies on earth are a giant award. I think there will be a very big loss for most people. ”

But the controversial part is not just this starting mission. The AI ​​Research Institute of Börayoglu analyzes the economic impact of EPOCH, AI and produces criteria for AI performance. Sata border model makers and others were believed to be an impartial way to check performance claims.

This is not the first time Epoch has gave way to disputes. In December, EPOCH, Openai, Chatgept-Maker later revealed that one of the AI ​​criteria presented the new O3 model. The feelings that felt social media users should take more attention about the relationship.

When Besiroglu announces mechanization, X user Oliver Havyka replied“Unfortunately, it seems directly nutritionally nutritionally nutritionally nutritionally nutritional work in the work of EPOCH research is that it seems approximate approval as it does not come from the true meaning.”

Börayehli’s mechanism, who is, Patrick Collison, Dwarkesh Patel, Jeff Dean, Sholto Douglas and Marcus Abramovitch. Friedman did not return the demand for the commentary of rough and dean Techcrunch.

Marcus confirmed Abramwich’s investment. Abramvicit is a managing partner in the Altx of the Crypto Hedge Foundation and self-toiler “Effective altruist.”

He said, because “the team is exceptionally and more deep than I know,” he said.

Is it good for people too?

However, Naysayers, who do all the work that do all the work, which are unmarried, agents, really do not check them through “Explosive Economic Growth”. Pointing to the point of a Published paper on the subject.

“Completely automation labor can be extensive abundance, living standards and new goods and services that we cannot imagine today,” he said.

This may be true for those who have agents. So employers instead of developing them at home (probably by other agents?)

On the other hand, this optimistic outlook is considering a key fact: if people do not work, they will not get income to get everything produced by AI agents.

Again, Burduroglu should actually increase the wage in such an EU automated world, because such employees are more valuable in additional roles that the EU could not complete. “

However, remember that the goal is for agents who do all the work. When asked, “even reduced salary, which is not only determined by economic well-being, is usually rented, dividend and government welfare.”

Thus, perhaps we all do our living from shares or real estate. When he does not always have a welfare – if AI agents pay taxes.

Although Besiroglu vision and mission is clearly extreme, the technical issue that wants to solve is legal. If each human employee has a personal staff of agents that help produce more work, it can be followed by economic abundance. And Besiroglu, at least one thing in one year: until the age of AI agents They don’t work very well.

He notes that they do not want them to be invalid, do not store information, and do not want to do independently, “and that they cannot execute long-term plans without leaving the rails.”

However, it has difficulty working on adjustments. As giant companies Salesforce and Microsoft We are building agent platforms. Openai too. And agent beginnings are many: experts from the tasks (foreign sales, financial analysis); to those who work on training information. They work on others Agent Price Economy.

Meanwhile, Besiroglu wants to know: mechanization is hired.