Five ways from the Big TV argument of Canadian party leaders

The leaders of the four-major Federal Party of Canada performed each other in the pre-general and final discussions of this month, but they stole many focus on the stage: US President Donald Trump.

A great question for the debate, will the leading liberal leader Mark Carney to stumble in the ballot box?

Former UK banking Governor Carney managed to survive despite the fact that the French dispute was less skilled in the country’s second language.

On Thursday, the conservative leader placed himself on site repeatedly: Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the new Democratic Party Jagmeet Singh and Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet.

How can Canada respond to the ongoing trade war.

Here are five big ways because of Thursday:

Carney’s opponents quickly recognized the mistakes of the unpopular predecessor, former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Conservative leader Poilievre referred to the Liberal Party in the last 10 years in power, “lost liberal decades.” He asked for issues such as a high price for living to drive the apartment and drive home.

“How can we believe it is different?” Asked Carney.

Blanchet also threw those who were thrown to Carney. “You claim that you are different – you should prove that you are better.”

Carney was forced to defend himself repeatedly, but only a month, despite sharing the Prime Minister’s banner as Trudeau.

“I’m a different person than Justin Trudeau,” said Carney.

The leaders asked how they would negotiate with Trump and respond to the tariffs in Canada.

Trump applied 25% tariffs for goods covering USMCA, 25% of the Canadian goods – Free Trade Deals in North America. Canada is also stored on steel and aluminum and cars with global US tariffs.

President Canada also spoke openly by becoming a 51st US state.

The Government of Canada previously said that his position was to carry out the tariffs for the dollar for the purpose of providing maximum pain in the US economy.

However, during the dispute, the leaders claimed that this was not equal to the fact.

“We passed the dollar tariffs for the dollar,” said Carney admitted that the US economy was more than 10 times in Canada’s size.

The liberal leader said that the focus will be able to maximize the pain in the United States and transfer to targeted tariffs designed to damage Canada to the least harm.

Trump seems to soften his tongue in Canada in recent weeks. After a telephone conversation with the US president, Carney said Trump was “constructive” of the “Canadian Sovereignty” and conversations.

After the April 28 elections, Canada and the United States are expected to start negotiations.

According to Canadians, the country facing the country outside the country, the disputes offered a fundamental policy discussions on topics from the apartment to the immigration.

It became clear that the canvasers have different choices before them.

Poilievre often rejected a small government that will keep taxes to increase economic growth and affordability for Canadians and affordable economic growth and convenience.

Meanwhile Singh pushed for stronger social programs in Canada, including the country’s national dental treatment and pharmacare programs and increase health costs.

The Carney Party was approached in terms of the center.

“The government can play a role, but his role should be catalytic,” he said during the dispute segment of strong leadership in the crisis.

Blank Leader Blanchet used the airtime to protect Quebec from different location and unique identity in Canada.

“I do not want to be the leader of Canada,” he said. The party supports Kvebek’s last separation from Canada and does not take seats outside the province. However, if a number of seats win, there may be a strong voting block in parliament.

Canada’s political system, many similar political parties, Sentrist liberals, right-bent conservatives, new Democrats, and only candidates in Quebec manage candidates. There is also a disqualified green side from the dispute to not work with enough candidates.

This means that the Canadians have different choices because they head to the voting booth.

However, the surveys prefer to support the most Canadian part of the Canadian in this election.

It has left the third place parties to fight to live. National Inquiries Singh’s new democrats that can be 8.5% of the new Democrats that can vote – can translate from 343 to five places, a large loss.

Singh, to hear the voice and paid a couple of times to separate the party from each other from each other as a choice for both Poilievre and Carney’s leftist voters.

“You can’t entrust all the forces of Mr. Carney,” Singh said.

Meanwhile, the block leader Blanchet included issues related to French-speaking provinces at every opportunity.

In the party, the current election stands to lose at least a lot of seat in the current voting, and instead of voting for liberals, Trump and his threats are better equipped to deal with it.

There were interruptions, inspired discussions and even random attack lines. However, in general, the tone of the four federal leaders was very sincere.

Because the leaders discussed the apartment crisis, the effort to measure the conversation was clear. In a boost, Carriey, turned out to stop himself before going to his opponent.

“A misunderstanding ….”., “CARNEY said, when he stopped the middle penalty,” I will be polite. “

After some heated exchanges, Carney and Poilievre shook hands and then the exchanged of several laughs.

In general, the United States was a different ton of those who watched their last presidential dispute.

Demonstrating some liberal and conservative candidates, Canadian federal debates were more friends than the past.